SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Submitted via IRC for SoyCow1984
Federal air marshals have begun following ordinary US citizens not suspected of a crime or on any terrorist watch list and collecting extensive information about their movements and behavior under a new domestic surveillance program that is drawing criticism from within the agency.
The previously undisclosed program, called "Quiet Skies," specifically targets travelers who "are not under investigation by any agency and are not in the Terrorist Screening Data Base," according to a Transportation Security Administration bulletin in March.
The internal bulletin describes the program's goal as thwarting threats to commercial aircraft "posed by unknown or partially known terrorists," and gives the agency broad discretion over which air travelers to focus on and how closely they are tracked.
[...] But some air marshals, in interviews and internal communications shared with the Globe, say the program has them tasked with shadowing travelers who appear to pose no real threat — a businesswoman who happened to have traveled through a Mideast hot spot, in one case; a Southwest Airlines flight attendant, in another; a fellow federal law enforcement officer, in a third.
Since this initiative launched in March, dozens of air marshals have raised concerns about the Quiet Skies program with senior officials and colleagues, sought legal counsel, and expressed misgivings about the surveillance program, according to interviews and documents reviewed by the Globe.
"What we are doing [in Quiet Skies] is troubling and raising some serious questions as to the validity and legality of what we are doing and how we are doing it," one air marshal wrote in a text message to colleagues.
Source: http://apps.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/graphics/2018/07/tsa-quiet-skies/?p1=HP_SpecialTSA [Ed Note: Not available for all browser modes]
Also at CNN, Fortune, The Verge, and The Hill.
(Score: 4, Touché) by Runaway1956 on Monday July 30 2018, @08:56PM (13 children)
Why don't you grab a handful of republicans, and stuff them up your arse?
I've been registered to vote for about 44 years now, and NOT ONCE have I been registered as a member of either party in the US. Which part of "I despise the two party system" do you fail to understand? Only a closed minded, polarized mind which has been molded by that two-party system can see me as a republican. You can run along, and tell your political masters that the brainwashing has been effective on you.
(Score: 0, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 30 2018, @09:29PM (12 children)
I don't bother memorizing every detail of each user here. I'M SORRY YOUR FEELZ GOT SO BUTTHURT!
I see you just got sent into a triggered mess instead of addressing my incredibly valid points regarding your dismissive treatment of real historic problems the US has had. I know you value freedom, but it is amazing how you are so blind to your own words. I point out the problems and you go into full meltdown.
QED the real snowflakes are you old farts who can't stand criticism.
(Score: 3, Troll) by RS3 on Tuesday July 31 2018, @01:23AM (6 children)
Your reaction seems pretty "BUTTHURT".
Personal attacks and insults are what's dividing the US and the rest of the world.
How about someday we all grow up, respect each others opinions whether we agree or not, and try to intelligently interact, collaborate, and come up with some common ground solutions.
(Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 31 2018, @02:03AM (5 children)
Haha, I only used that phrasing since Runaway kicked it off with shoving republican up my ass. I'm done with trying to be 100% civil, sometimes the proper reaction is to call people out on their shit and not baby them in the hopes they'll see your point. It almost never works.
Hmm, in the recent past I just found this little bit of yours.
So apparently you sometimes share your opinions and people find them offensive / trollish. Pot meet kettle. We'll see how long your politeness hangs on in the shitstorm of trolling, stupidity and hypocrisy that occurs around here.
(Score: 2, Troll) by RS3 on Tuesday July 31 2018, @02:29AM (4 children)
I agree, runaway did write that. I kind of skimmed, so I didn't get all of the conversation, and I figured he felt he needed to write that, kind of like you feel you need to.
I strongly disagree with you saying that the proper reaction is to call people out. You may think you're winning some (ridiculous) battle over one person, but to the rest of us who read here hoping to learn something, it's just offensive. It's kind of like picking through rotting food in a dumpster hoping to find something edible. Not really worth the effort.
I came here hoping for more intelligent discourse. I see that people like you aren't willing to rise above the slashdot crowd's culture. Maybe I need to start my own site.
(Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 31 2018, @03:56AM
I don't think you quite understand what is going on in the world right now.
You want civil discussions go to Hacker News, that is the only site I've come across where politeness is somewhat enforced and people truly strive to remain calm and civil.
Runaway quite often spews insulting crap so I don't feel any obligation to coddle his feelings here. He dismissed a ton of horrific crap brought up as examples of things worse than "Homeland Security and TSA were the two single worst mistakes ever made by the US government."
I can only assume you just haven't had enough exposure, but after years hanging around this site I feel no pangs of conscience for being a bit rough on Runaway. Save your criticism for a post more deserving of it, and while you're at it maybe reflect on how your insults are no better just because you're a superior sounding snob.
Don't let the back button break your finger on your way elsewhere.
(Score: 2) by unauthorized on Tuesday July 31 2018, @10:40AM (2 children)
Fuck Beta 2.0 here we come!
(Score: 2) by RS3 on Tuesday July 31 2018, @01:47PM (1 child)
And it's nothing against this amazing site and its owners / admins. I'm here and it's awesome. It's that I have a slightly different view and I think this site would be (much) better if we could collectively vote certain trolls off. Not necessarily the person (as /. had to), but the comments that are truly troll turds. And I know they do that a tiny bit. It's all about where do you draw that line.
So I'm very good at devil's advocacy, and I also see and categorically agree with TMB's philosophy of letting anyone post anything. I'm a huge free-speech advocate. But this is more like a meeting room and someone is disrupting the meeting to the point that it's wasting everyone's time and we're forgetting what we came here for.
But I'm also not so sure about the voting system. I don't think it's fair to downmod someone just because you don't agree with their view. That's the beginning of fascism.
(Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 31 2018, @06:48PM
So we need 100% freedom of speech, except for that annoying guy. He needs to go.
Lawl, don't make absolute statements if you are going to waffle on them within 3 seconds.
(Score: 2, Troll) by Runaway1956 on Tuesday July 31 2018, @02:28AM (4 children)
You don't even bother to read responses to your posts, let alone keep track of the people you are responding to.
That, from my own post, does not contradict anything you have said about the welfare system. Literacy - check your local community college for help with that concept. I am very much aware that the welfare recipient who tries to better him/herself is penalized for taking a job, unless that job pays far more than welfare provides. The system has been built to encourage people to rely on welfare. So, again,
BTW - where do you think the bodies come from that fuel the prison for profit scheme that the US is so famous for? The bodies don't come from families that instill honesty and work ethics into their children. The majority of those bodies come from single mom families, who have been instilled with the proper semi-subservient attitude necessary to push social workers into releasing money. Single mom families most certainly teach reliance on government, as opposed to self reliance. Mom can't be Mom and Dad at the same time, very effectively. Worse, if Dad is in the pen, his only lessons for his children consist of failed methods of "beat the Man".
(Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 31 2018, @04:07AM (1 child)
"have been instilled with the proper semi-subservient attitude necessary to push social workers into releasing money" uhhh, now you're drifting off the deep end. Nothing like a little criticism to get you to reveal your true feelings.
Welfare was not designed the way it is, it was morphed from something helpful into something twisted because conservatives had to make sure no undeserving people abused the system. I'm glad you're not a full blown RWNJ but I really wish you'd realize that you have quite a bit of culture war propaganda stuffed away in that melon.
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Tuesday July 31 2018, @02:26PM
May I suggest that you revisit the administration of William Jefferson Clinton, aka, Slick Willy, to see what he did with welfare? See, this is part of our problem in America - your side blames all the evils of government on the other side, while the other side blames all the evils on your side.
Can we all just grow up, and examine the evidence? NEITHER SIDE KNOWS WHAT IN HELL IT IS DOING!!
Ditto with immigration reform, Medicaid, social security - the list goes on and on.
You want to whine and moan about the Republicans? That's cool - but you had better be looking critically at the Dems as well. Otherwise, you're just another partisan horn blower.
(Score: 2) by unauthorized on Tuesday July 31 2018, @11:01AM (1 child)
Why do you assume it's not the economy who is doing it and the welfare isn't compensating for a problem that the free and independent market has created because it creates an efficient pseudo-slavery model like it always does? Ah right, religion. The free market is our lord and savior and Adam Smith is his one and true son that came to save us from the red devil.
Welfare applies to everyone, and only some population groups exhibit the behavior you describe. Therefore it is not welfare that is the root cause, if it did then you would see a more uniform distribution among populations who receive welfare. It might compound an existing maladaptive social behavior among some social groups, but the problem is already there to begin with.
(Score: 3, Informative) by Runaway1956 on Tuesday July 31 2018, @02:39PM
I'm glad that you can see the possibility of negative feedback loops in all of this. And, I'll maintain that single parent homes are one of the contributory feedbacks in the loop. No, of course not all kids from single parent homes are bad. And, of course not all kids from two parent homes are good. But - I wonder - has anyone ever done a survey to see how many of each are incarcerated? Hmmmmm - - -
https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/pji02.pdf [bjs.gov]
Please click the link, there are more interesting bits of information on that page, like racial and ethnic breakdowns of prison population. But those are the highlights you can't deny - single parent homes, and abusive parents really put the hurt on people who may or may not be prone to break the law anyway. Bottom line? Kids need a mom, and kids need a dad. The prison population pretty much proves that. Someone might make a case that if a kid can't have both a mother and a father, then maybe they need Mom more than they need Dad - but I've seen no evidence of that, whether empiric evidence, or psychobabble evidence.