Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday July 31 2018, @05:27AM   Printer-friendly
from the Godzilla-stomping-action dept.

TorrentFreak:

After more than a quarter-century, SimCity 2000 still receives plenty of interest from nostalgic gamers who like to relive their early gaming experiences. This is likely one of the reasons why developer Nicholas Ochoa decided to code a remake using the Electron framework.

The game, titled OpenSC2K, was released on GitHub earlier this year and received quite a bit of attention on sites such as Reddit and Hacker News.

While it is billed as an “open source” version, the remake did include original artwork, belonging to Electronic Arts. These images and sounds are definitely not free to use, something the developer is fully aware of now.

A few days ago Electronic Arts sent a DMCA takedown notice to GitHub asking the platform to remove the infringing repository from its site.

“Assets from the game SimCity 2000 are being infringed upon,” EA writes. The company points out that the game can be purchased legally through Origin where it’s still being sold for a few dollars.

While OpenSC2K is far from a full remake, Electronic Arts makes it clear that the SimCity 2000 assets are not for public use.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by bzipitidoo on Tuesday July 31 2018, @03:48PM

    by bzipitidoo (4388) on Tuesday July 31 2018, @03:48PM (#715231) Journal

    > It's really not that burdensome. Hell, it's one "Save As" or a small tag on a file.

    Smart viruses that reduce your system performance by only 1%, exercise a little restraint the better not to be noticed, aren't that burdensome either. How about automatic login, is that much of a burden removed? Yet people want it.

    > The alternative? People literally just nicking Mario images

    See? You are infected with "copyrightitis". That word "nicking" does not describe what they are doing. They are NOT stealing, they are copying.

    And "nicking" is not the sole alternative.

    > no artist or musician wanting to give you their work.

    What exactly are we talking about here? Give? For free? If they are willing to do that with copyright, why not without copyright? Particularly as long as attribution is kept? Or is it really plagiarism to which they object? Don't need copyright to keep attribution.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2