Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday July 31 2018, @11:55AM   Printer-friendly
from the just-publish-FCC-members'-real-time-location-data dept.

Gizmodo reports:

In a letter this May, Senator Ron Wyden called on FCC Chairman Ajit Pai to recuse himself from an ongoing FCC investigation into companies gathering real-time location data on cellphones users. As an attorney six years ago, Pai represented one of the firms now central to the investigation.

The firm, Securus, a major provider of inmate call services to jails, is known to have provided location data on mobile customers to law enforcement officials without a court order. But despite his past work for Securus, Pai says he will not recuse himself.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0, Flamebait) by khallow on Tuesday July 31 2018, @04:48PM (8 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday July 31 2018, @04:48PM (#715274) Journal
    Well, it's at least the most corrupt since the Obama administration which played the same games with the FCC (for example, the appointment of Tom Wheeler [wikipedia.org] to the same position back in 2013). Well, hopefully we'll see the Trump administration take a huge hit in the 2018 elections and someone in Congress curb the power of the Executive Branch like they should have back a century ago.

    This episode of Whataboutism brought to you by an AC who can't be bothered to remember the last five years of US history, much less bother with the many spectacular failings of the US pertaining to corruption going back to its beginnings.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   -1  
       Flamebait=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Flamebait' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   0  
  • (Score: 2) by ilPapa on Tuesday July 31 2018, @09:27PM (5 children)

    by ilPapa (2366) on Tuesday July 31 2018, @09:27PM (#715413) Journal

    Well, it's at least the most corrupt since the Obama administration which played the same games with the FCC

    How many indictments, guilty pleas and convictions happened to the Obama administration?

    --
    You are still welcome on my lawn.
    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday August 01 2018, @03:59AM (4 children)

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday August 01 2018, @03:59AM (#715519) Journal

      How many indictments, guilty pleas and convictions happened to the Obama administration?

      Not good enough. Let's review a sample of the actual crimes of the time: 200+ cases of accessory to murder of people in Mexico and the US, fraudulent statements about the Benghazi attacks prior to the 2012 election, illegal IRS interference in the creation of tax exempt conservative groups, and a massive security breach (and subsequent destruction of evidence) committed by a Hillary Clinton for the purpose of bypassing Obama Administration oversight and FOIA requests.

      At this point, the question becomes not how many "indictments, guilty pleas and convictions", but rather why we don't have more of them? The administration without the convictions then becomes more corrupt than the one with convictions.

      • (Score: 2) by ilPapa on Wednesday August 01 2018, @04:22AM (1 child)

        by ilPapa (2366) on Wednesday August 01 2018, @04:22AM (#715527) Journal

        Let's review a sample of the actual crimes of the time: 200+ cases of accessory to murder of people in Mexico and the US, fraudulent statements about the Benghazi attacks prior to the 2012 election, illegal IRS interference in the creation of tax exempt conservative groups, and a massive security breach (and subsequent destruction of evidence) committed by a Hillary Clinton for the purpose of bypassing Obama Administration oversight and FOIA requests.

        and with all of the investigations, hearings, etc, how many indictments were there?

        And why isn't the Trump Justice Department prosecuting all these crimes? Is the fix in with Trump, too?

        Man, you gotta get off the Qanon shit. It's distorted your ability to reason beyond all repair. Tomorrow, you should step away from the computer and go outside, maybe ride your bike around a little bit. Get some fresh air. You might regain some perspective on where you lost your way.

        --
        You are still welcome on my lawn.
        • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday August 01 2018, @12:04PM

          by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday August 01 2018, @12:04PM (#715609) Journal

          and with all of the investigations, hearings, etc, how many indictments were there?

          Exactly.

          And why isn't the Trump Justice Department prosecuting all these crimes?

          Because they'll need protection from the next administration.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 01 2018, @03:54PM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 01 2018, @03:54PM (#715748)

        At this point, the question becomes not how many "indictments, guilty pleas and convictions", but rather why we don't have more of them? The administration without the convictions then becomes more corrupt than the one with convictions.

        At this point, you should stop trying so hard to rationalize your beliefs and start wondering if maybe, just maybe, you have flawed beliefs.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 01 2018, @03:48PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 01 2018, @03:48PM (#715744)

    If choosing Tom Wheeler is your best example of Obama being corrupt then two things:

    1.) Trump is far, far more corrupt. It's not even close.

    2.) Your not trying that hard.

    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday August 02 2018, @01:27AM

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday August 02 2018, @01:27AM (#716009) Journal

      If choosing Tom Wheeler is your best example of Obama being corrupt

      It's not.

      2.) Your not trying that hard.

      Bingo.