Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Wednesday August 01 2018, @03:14PM   Printer-friendly
from the not-good-enough dept.

Apple Comes Under Media Fire in China

Apple Inc. has come under fire by Chinese state media, which claims the U.S. technology giant isn't doing enough to block texts and images trafficking in prohibited content including pornography, gambling and counterfeit goods.

In a barrage that began last week, China's state-controlled news agency Xinhua and at least four state-supported media outlets have published criticism of Apple for not doing enough to filter banned content on its iMessage service.

State broadcaster CCTV joined in Tuesday on another front, saying Apple's app store allowed illegal gambling apps disguised as official lottery apps.

[...] On Monday, China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology and other top government agencies said they would impose new requirements requiring mobile-phone makers to include spam-filtering features.

Also at 9to5Mac.

Related: India Regulator Threatens to Ban Iphones Over Anti-Spam App


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 01 2018, @05:37PM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 01 2018, @05:37PM (#715813)

    I want humanity to profit; that is the good of humanity.

  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 01 2018, @06:26PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 01 2018, @06:26PM (#715841)

    Incorrect. Humanity would have been MUCH better served if solar power / electric vehicle / sustainable infrastructure was built in the 70s. Instead we got oil companies pushing legislation and US imperialism in order to increase their profits.

    You are a short sighted fool bending your ideology to try and fit humanity's evolving identity. Capitalism has its place, but at this point it should not be 100% of human activity like you wish, even with your idealistic "voluntary contracts" version of reality.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 01 2018, @09:09PM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 01 2018, @09:09PM (#715909)

      It took the computer industry and it's concurrent development of materiakl sciences, multiple nobel prizes and huge increase of scale to bring the technology where it is today.

      Technology advances along with civilization. I remember in the 70's when solar was ~$100/watt (today about $0.30/watt), one hundred fold more economical. Integrated circuits follow(-ed?) Moore's observation of halving in size every 18 months. Solar follows a similar exponential curve at a halving in $/kw every 4 years and has since their creation in the 1800's. Also, energy makes use of several technologies: the solar cells themselves, panels, inverters and storage. Any one technology, while useful in its own, is limited towards being useful as an energy substitute, some of which did not make sens developing until other parts where shown to be viable. And it wasn't, likely still not possible to predict what some of the concurrent technologies are. An example is the used to use lead acid batteries (still do in most cases) and would have been very unlikely to pursue lithium batteries which were popularized by laptop computers.

      http://rameznaam.com/2011/03/17/the-exponential-gains-in-solar-power-per-dollar/ [rameznaam.com]

      • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 02 2018, @08:15AM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 02 2018, @08:15AM (#716112)

        This is begging the question. The way we build cities is designed around and to service the personal ownership of automobiles that are run on petrol. A less capitalist society would have gone with electric public transit from the start and could have made the transition to solar power without lithium batteries. Then, the incentives to develop solar panels would have come from that market instead of it being a side effect of node miniaturization.

        As for computer themselves, so what? I don't know about you, but computers do nothing for quality of living from where I sit. Sure, increases in productivity *should* have made things better. But it didn't. There more poor people. More hungry people. About the same life expectancies and those last few years suck worse and worse... Sure, on paper better productivity improves people's quality of life. But overtime people just repopulate and the number even out only the income keeps being more and more concentrated at the top.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 02 2018, @12:24PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 02 2018, @12:24PM (#716162)

          We've seen what less capitalistic societies do; they drive people into the ground and crush them into the mud.