Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Thursday August 02 2018, @05:35AM   Printer-friendly
from the MS-DaaS dept.

Computerworld:

[...] Microsoft is getting ready to replace Windows 10 with the Microsoft Managed Desktop. This will be a "desktop-as-a-service" (DaaS) offering. Instead of owning Windows, you'll "rent" it by the month.

DaaS for Windows isn't new. Citrix and VMware have made a living from it for years. Microsoft has offered Remote Desktop Services, formerly Terminal Services, for ages.

Microsoft Managed Desktop is a new take. It avoids the latency problem of the older Windows DaaS offerings by keeping the bulk of the operating system on your PC.

But you'll no longer be in charge of your Windows PC. Instead, it will be automatically provisioned and patched for you by Microsoft. Maybe you'll be OK with that.

ZDNet:

January 14, 2020 is the last day Microsoft will provide security updates for Windows 7. According to Microsoft's estimates, there are 184 million commercial devices out there (as of April 2018 and excluding China) still on Windows 7. And 64 percent of those devices are more than five years old.

For Microsoft's reseller partners, that's a huge potential opportunity, as they heard repeatedly during Microsoft's Inspire partner show last week. Traditionally, end of Microsoft support for an operating system means more chances for partners to sell customers on migration, provisioning and other services.

At the same time, the way business customers are purchasing PCs is changing. By 2020 -- the same time Windows 7 hits end of support -- 30 percent of all PCs will be acquired via DaaS, or device-as-a-service, plans, Microsoft officials told partners last week.

[...] During the Inspire show, Microsoft execs worked to hammer home the idea that resellers shouldn't simply be selling Windows 7 users a new device running Windows 10. Instead, they should take the DaaS approach and set up a whole platform to lease new Windows 10 PCs to customers.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by bobthecimmerian on Thursday August 02 2018, @12:32PM (3 children)

    by bobthecimmerian (6834) on Thursday August 02 2018, @12:32PM (#716166)

    I hate Microsoft as much as the next Free Software Foundation card-carrying member, but before we dive too deep into this, the ZDNet article states that Microsoft expects small businesses to adopt this model. Computerworld's supporting evidence for their article is another ZDNet piece, https://www.zdnet.com/article/microsofts-got-a-new-plan-for-managing-windows-10-devices-for-a-monthly-fee/ [zdnet.com] which states that it will be aimed at enterprise customers.

    Corporations using Microsoft desktops usually already pay a monthly Microsoft tax in the form of Office365 plus support contracts. This isn't that much of a change for them.

    We haven't seen anything yet actually indicating Microsoft is going to push this model on home users. I think if they did, the hardcore PC gamers would scream and then pay anyway. Almost everyone else would jump to Android, ChromeOS, and Macs with a tiny trickle, unfortunately, to non-Android, non-ChromeOS Linux. But if this is on the plan it's far away. I think it would be a terrible mistake by Microsoft. I would say that I'm all for it, but if 30% of the Windows market jumps further into the Apple or Google ecosystem the end result for user freedom is every bit as terrible. Arguably it's worse, because the Windows app ecosystem is more open than on Apple and the Google data collection sets the global standard for "most evil".

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by Pino P on Thursday August 02 2018, @01:01PM

    by Pino P (4721) on Thursday August 02 2018, @01:01PM (#716180) Journal

    Almost everyone else would jump to Android, ChromeOS, and Macs with a tiny trickle, unfortunately, to non-Android, non-ChromeOS Linux.

    That depends on how fast Google can get its fourth point in gear and start shipping Crostini on more Chromebooks. (Crostini, as I understand it, is a container to run an X11/GNU userland on Chrome OS.)

  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by tangomargarine on Thursday August 02 2018, @06:51PM (1 child)

    by tangomargarine (667) on Thursday August 02 2018, @06:51PM (#716390)

    but before we dive too deep into this, the ZDNet article states that Microsoft expects small businesses to adopt this model.

    Oh come on, baby...just the tip...

    I think it would be a terrible mistake by Microsoft.

    Maybe, but that hardly means they won't do it. Just look at what Mozilla has been busy doing the last several years.

    I would say that I'm all for it, but if 30% of the Windows market jumps further into the Apple or Google ecosystem the end result for user freedom is every bit as terrible. Arguably it's worse, because the Windows app ecosystem is more open than on Apple and the Google data collection sets the global standard for "most evil".

    A fair point. It's too bad appealing to Microsoft's better side would be an exercise in futility.

    It's sad that we've come as far as we have already (even ignoring this article) in the field of locked-down computers. Hardware whitelists, Trusted Computing, locked bootloaders. management engines...computers used to be a thing where you just put software on it and the thing ran it. Now we have to get permission to use our own hardware.

    RMS is right about everything if given enough time. Unfortunately the frog is a long ways towards boiled already.

    --
    "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 03 2018, @05:03AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 03 2018, @05:03AM (#716562)

      I couldn't even get "plays_for_sure" to work reliably.

      That one was so faith_based it belongs in a church.