Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Thursday August 02 2018, @06:10PM   Printer-friendly
from the Number-Nine,-Number-Nine,-Number-Nine... dept.

Planet Nine: 'Insensitive' Term Riles Scientists

The International Astronomical Union (IAU) famously reclassified Pluto as a "dwarf planet" in 2006. That decision remains highly controversial today, as made clear by the new note, which appeared in the July 29 issue of the Planetary Exploration Newsletter.

The note:

ON THE INSENSITIVE USE OF THE TERM "PLANET 9" FOR OBJECTS BEYOND PLUTO

We the undersigned wish to remind our colleagues that the IAU planet definition adopted in 2006 has been controversial and is far from universally accepted. Given this, and given the incredible accomplishment of the discovery of Pluto, the harbinger of the solar system's third zone — the Kuiper Belt — by planetary astronomer Clyde W. Tombaugh in 1930, we the undersigned believe the use of the term 'Planet 9' for objects beyond Pluto is insensitive to Professor Tombaugh's legacy.

We further believe the use of this term should be discontinued in favor of culturally and taxonomically neutral terms for such planets, such as Planet X, Planet Next, or Giant Planet Five.

35 researchers signed the note, including Alan Stern, principal investigator of the New Horizons mission.

Of more interest may be this proposal concerning future exploration of Uranus and Neptune:

Outer Solar System Exploration: A Compelling and Unified Dual Mission Decadal Strategy for Exploring Uranus, Neptune, Triton, Dwarf Planets, and Small KBOs and Centaurs

Related: Uranus and Neptune Are Potential Targets for 2030s Missions
Another Trans-Neptunian Object With a High Orbital Inclination Points to Planet Nine
CU Boulder Researchers Say Collective Gravity, Not Planet Nine, Explains Orbits of Detached Objects
Planet Nine Search Turns Up 10 More Moons of Jupiter


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by jelizondo on Thursday August 02 2018, @06:39PM (3 children)

    by jelizondo (653) Subscriber Badge on Thursday August 02 2018, @06:39PM (#716384) Journal

    Oh dear! How far we fallen!

    I wish to protest the Higgs field name as being insensitive towards Aristotle’s aether and also, Empedocles is furious of the fun made of his theory of the elements.

    Back to planets, calling Mars the fourth rock from the Sun is like totally insensitive to the Egyptians and Chinese, who were the first to identify it and study its orbit.

    Need I go on? If we are going to “respect” dead people, let us respect all of them, not some particular guy for some stupid reason.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Gaaark on Thursday August 02 2018, @06:48PM

    by Gaaark (41) on Thursday August 02 2018, @06:48PM (#716388) Journal

    I wish to protest the name Jelizondo: it is insensitive to the whole Tribe of Gum.
    :)

    --
    --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 02 2018, @08:26PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 02 2018, @08:26PM (#716433)

    Wait, does that mean that studying Mars is cultural appropriation?

  • (Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Thursday August 02 2018, @09:13PM

    by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Thursday August 02 2018, @09:13PM (#716459)

    If we are going to “respect” dead people, let us respect all of them...

    That's right. I'm dead sometimes, for tax reasons. I demand respect.