Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:
The House of Representatives has combined the largely good Music Modernization Act with the CLASSICS Act, which would add new royalties and penalties to recordings made before 1972, without giving anything back to the public. That same mistake was replicated in the Senate with S. 2823.
The CLASSICS Act would extend federal copyright restrictions and penalties to sound recordings made between 1923 and 1972, making it so that songs recorded in that era would, for the first time, not be able to be streamed online without a license. Currently, various state laws govern this relationship, and those laws don't give record labels control over streaming.
The CLASSICS Act gives nothing back to the public. It doesn't increase access to pre-1972 recordings, which are already played regularly on Internet radio. And it doesn't let the public use these recordings without permission any sooner. While some recording artists and their heirs will receive money under the act, the main beneficiaries will be recording companies, who will control the use of classic recordings for another fifty years. Important recordings from the 1920s, 30s, and 40s won't enter the public domain until 2067. And users of recordings that are already over 90 years old will face the risk of federal copyright's massive, unpredictable penalties.
-- submitted from IRC
(Score: 3, Touché) by Gaaark on Friday August 03 2018, @09:47PM
Largely good Music: so 'music' like Justin Bieber puts out will not be a part of this? Only the good music?
Where will it stop?
Obviously Celine Dion, Michael Jackson and the stuff played on pop radio will slip by this, but i'm guessing Radiohead, Depeche Mode, Black Sabbath, Deep Purple, R.Stones etc will be affected by this?
Damn.
Couldn't we just have a largely shitty Music Modernization Act to cover the Bieber et al's and leave the Good Music untouched?
--- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---