Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday August 07 2018, @09:22AM   Printer-friendly
from the pics-or-it-didn't-happen dept.

Submitted via IRC for Bytram

As he was brushing his teeth on the morning of July 17, 2014, Thomas Royen, a little-known retired German statistician, suddenly lit upon the proof of a famous conjecture at the intersection of geometry, probability theory, and statistics that had eluded top experts for decades.

Known as the Gaussian correlation inequality (GCI), the conjecture originated in the 1950s, was posed in its most elegant form in 1972 and has held mathematicians in its thrall ever since. "I know of people who worked on it for 40 years," said Donald Richards, a statistician at Pennsylvania State University. "I myself worked on it for 30 years."

[...] No one is quite sure how, in the 21st century, news of Royen's proof managed to travel so slowly. "It was clearly a lack of communication in an age where it's very easy to communicate," [Bo'az] Klartag said.

"But anyway, at least we found it," he added—and "it's beautiful."

[...] The "feeling of deep joy and gratitude" that comes from finding an important proof has been reward enough. "It is like a kind of grace," he said. "We can work for a long time on a problem and suddenly an angel—[which] stands here poetically for the mysteries of our neurons—brings a good idea."

Source: https://www.wired.com/2017/04/elusive-math-proof-found-almost-lost

Abstract

Paper


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Tuesday August 07 2018, @11:27AM (8 children)

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday August 07 2018, @11:27AM (#718185) Journal

    Thank's for posting the ArX link , the wired piece was a bit *too* fluffy for my delicate morning senses....

    I didn't and TFS doesn't contain one.
    But for your delicate Tuesday morning (Tuesday's gray ... and Wednesday too), here it is [arxiv.org]
    Picked from the quantamagazine, which originally published [quantamagazine.org] the story (still fluffy).

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by opinionated_science on Tuesday August 07 2018, @11:47AM (1 child)

    by opinionated_science (4031) on Tuesday August 07 2018, @11:47AM (#718190)

    there was a "Paper" link, that pleasantly, contain a reference to the text.

    Many links, do not....;-/

    • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Tuesday August 07 2018, @12:04PM

      by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday August 07 2018, @12:04PM (#718194) Journal

      Ah, yes, now that you hinted what to look for, I see it.
      Alone on its line, carefully squeezed between the fluffy content on top and the bottom line of the border surrounding TFS. For a better effect, I would suggest the editor to enclose the link between <sub></sub> tags, it will make it less evident.

      --
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
  • (Score: 2, Informative) by khallow on Tuesday August 07 2018, @12:12PM (2 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday August 07 2018, @12:12PM (#718196) Journal
    Look at the link "Paper" above. Probably should have linked to the abstract link [arxiv.org] though. Then one doesn't need to download the PDF to read a little about the paper first.
    • (Score: 2) by Fnord666 on Tuesday August 07 2018, @02:33PM (1 child)

      by Fnord666 (652) on Tuesday August 07 2018, @02:33PM (#718257) Homepage
      Thanks for the feedback. I have added a link to the abstract and will link to those in the future.
      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday August 07 2018, @10:19PM

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday August 07 2018, @10:19PM (#718469) Journal
        Also, if you're given the PDF URL (and can't recall how to modify the URL to get the abstract link), the abstract can easily be found by internet searching for the eight digit number of the article which is embedded in the PDF URL.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by maxwell demon on Tuesday August 07 2018, @02:23PM (2 children)

    by maxwell demon (1608) on Tuesday August 07 2018, @02:23PM (#718253) Journal

    Please link to the abstract page for arXiv papers. Getting from the abstract to the paper is trivial. Getting from the paper to the abstract is a PITA.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    • (Score: 2) by Fnord666 on Tuesday August 07 2018, @02:30PM

      by Fnord666 (652) on Tuesday August 07 2018, @02:30PM (#718255) Homepage
      Will do going forward. Thanks for the feedback!
    • (Score: 3, Informative) by c0lo on Tuesday August 07 2018, @02:43PM

      by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday August 07 2018, @02:43PM (#718262) Journal

      Ok.

      For the occasions it accidentally does not happen, seems that the PITA is manually replacing 3 letters and deleting other 4. Like in:

      https://arxiv.org/pdf/1408.1028.pdf
      to
      https://arxiv.org/abs/1408.1028

      --
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford