Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday August 07 2018, @09:22AM   Printer-friendly
from the pics-or-it-didn't-happen dept.

Submitted via IRC for Bytram

As he was brushing his teeth on the morning of July 17, 2014, Thomas Royen, a little-known retired German statistician, suddenly lit upon the proof of a famous conjecture at the intersection of geometry, probability theory, and statistics that had eluded top experts for decades.

Known as the Gaussian correlation inequality (GCI), the conjecture originated in the 1950s, was posed in its most elegant form in 1972 and has held mathematicians in its thrall ever since. "I know of people who worked on it for 40 years," said Donald Richards, a statistician at Pennsylvania State University. "I myself worked on it for 30 years."

[...] No one is quite sure how, in the 21st century, news of Royen's proof managed to travel so slowly. "It was clearly a lack of communication in an age where it's very easy to communicate," [Bo'az] Klartag said.

"But anyway, at least we found it," he added—and "it's beautiful."

[...] The "feeling of deep joy and gratitude" that comes from finding an important proof has been reward enough. "It is like a kind of grace," he said. "We can work for a long time on a problem and suddenly an angel—[which] stands here poetically for the mysteries of our neurons—brings a good idea."

Source: https://www.wired.com/2017/04/elusive-math-proof-found-almost-lost

Abstract

Paper


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by lentilla on Wednesday August 08 2018, @02:19AM

    by lentilla (1770) on Wednesday August 08 2018, @02:19AM (#718600)

    Cars being too complicated for me, I liked this explaination [czerniak.info]. Going back through my notes, I see I used a Kalman filter in 2013 when I was trying to get a sensible altitude reading out of my GPS (the readings bounce around, 60 metres up, 20 metres down, and so on).

    Kalman filters can help when four conditions are true:

    1. You can get measurements of a situation at a constant rate.
    2. The measurements have error that follows a bell curve.
    3. You know the mathematics behind the situation.
    4. You want an estimate of what's really happening.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2