Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Saturday August 11 2018, @12:53AM   Printer-friendly
from the another-day-another-CPU dept.

Although a wide range of potential applications exists for the ARMV8-M processors, developers working on secure real-time applications will certainly see the largest benefit. So far, the ARMV8-M architecture can be found in M23 and M33 Cortex-M and M35P processors. Let’s take a look at the new features included in ARMV8-M and how these processors differ from previous generation ARMV7-M parts.

[...] The ARMV8-M feature that really sets the M23, M33, and M35P apart is their support for ARM TrustZone. TrustZone is a security extension that provides hardware isolation within the microcontroller so that developers can create secure and unsecure regions. These regions can be locations in RAM, Flash, or even interrupts and peripherals. The separation between secure and unsecure regions creates isolation within the microcontroller, allowing developers to protect mission-critical code and data.

The isolation creates two new modes that the processor can be running in: secure and unsecure. When in secure mode, the executing code can access all memory within both the secure and unsecure zones. However, if the processor is executing in the unsecure zone, only the unsecure regions can be seen. The secure regions are hidden and cannot be executed from the unsecure state without special code being added, which creates a gateway to access a secure call. This makes it possible to use secure functions while hiding what is happening behind the scenes. 

There are several other new features that developers will find interesting besides the TrustZone extension. These include:

  • Simpler MPU setup
  • Flexible breakpoint configuration
  • Improved trace support
  • Instruction set enhancements
  • Dynamic reprioritization of interrupts

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 11 2018, @02:47AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 11 2018, @02:47AM (#720168)

    > Please. No more. Stop it with the crazy complicated IRQ controllers.

    Do any processors implement your suggested scheme? Just curious.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 11 2018, @03:05AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 11 2018, @03:05AM (#720179)

    The processor itself didn't have an IRQ controller. The motherboard had a CPLD which did several minor things, including interrupts. It pretty much implemented the suggested scheme. (not the exact register numbers of course)

    That was with VxWorks running on a PowerPC.