Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Monday August 13 2018, @06:25AM   Printer-friendly
from the that's-a-lot dept.

Submitted via IRC for SoyCow1984

The first full characterization measurement of an accelerator beam in six dimensions will advance the understanding and performance of current and planned accelerators around the world.

A team of researchers led by the University of Tennessee, Knoxville conducted the measurement in a beam test facility at the Department of Energy's Oak Ridge National Laboratory using a replica of the Spallation Neutron Source's linear accelerator, or linac. The details are published in the journal Physical Review Letters.

"Our goal is to better understand the physics of the beam so that we can improve how accelerators operate," said Sarah Cousineau, group leader in ORNL's Research Accelerator Division and UT joint faculty professor. "Part of that is related to being able to fully characterize or measure a beam in 6D space -- and that's something that, until now, has never been done."

Six-dimensional space is like 3D space but includes three additional coordinates on the x, y, and z axes to track motion or velocity.

"Right away we saw the beam has this complex structure in 6D space that you can't see below 5D -- layers and layers of complexities that can't be detangled," Cousineau said. "The measurement also revealed the beam structure is directly related to the beam's intensity, which gets more complex as the intensity increases."

Previous attempts to fully characterize an accelerator beam fell victim to "the curse of dimensionality," in which measurements in low dimensions become exponentially more difficult in higher dimensions. Scientists have tried to circumvent the issue by adding three 2D measurements together to create a quasi-6D representation. The UT-ORNL team notes that approach is incomplete as a measurement of the beam's initial conditions entering the accelerator, which determine beam behavior farther down the linac.

Source: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/08/180810132608.htm


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by inertnet on Monday August 13 2018, @09:08AM

    by inertnet (4071) on Monday August 13 2018, @09:08AM (#720876) Journal

    I really have no idea, but it looks to me like they could have used vector math instead. They appear to be trying to reference a whole beam of particles at once. If you consider a single particle, it could have a location (x, y, z), a direction of motion and a strength of motion (speed). Both location and speed of particles can't be exactly expressed for a single moment in time. But with all these dimensions combined I guess that a particles' position and motion can be described exactly. They're trying to describe a whole bunch of particles, all with similar properties.

    That's as far as my imagination goes, after reading TFS.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3