Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday August 14 2018, @05:43PM   Printer-friendly
from the can-you-ID-me-now? dept.

Browser fingerprinting is where JavaScript or other means are used to scrape uniquely identifying information from the browser metadata and functions such as how it draws a canvas object. In it's latest release Apple will defeat browser fingerprinting by making all Mac users look alike to advertisers and websites that use fingerprinting to track users. Apple can afford to do this as it doesn't have skin in the online advertising game.

[This is likely only going to be for the Safari browser. - Ed]


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Pino P on Wednesday August 15 2018, @01:15PM (7 children)

    by Pino P (4721) on Wednesday August 15 2018, @01:15PM (#721758) Journal

    Why? So users of free browsers can get reduced-functionality versions of web applications that limit themselves to the subset of web APIs that Safari supports? Some video hosts whose server software is free software will refuse to serve video to Safari because Safari for macOS and Safari for iOS support zero (0) royalty-free video codecs. If not, a website could send a WebM video (muted so that it'll autoplay), and then if it plays, the site's fingerprinting script would conclude that the user isn't really using Safari.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Wednesday August 15 2018, @01:47PM (6 children)

    by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Wednesday August 15 2018, @01:47PM (#721769) Homepage Journal

    For the same reason you lock your car doors when you park it. There's nothing stopping anyone from easily breaking a window but it does make the job of screwing you slightly more difficult. I'm very much in favor of making it as difficult as practically possible to follow my every movement and fuck anyone whose business model requires constant surveillance of me.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
    • (Score: 2) by Pino P on Thursday August 16 2018, @12:22PM (5 children)

      by Pino P (4721) on Thursday August 16 2018, @12:22PM (#722144) Journal

      The problem with that analogy is that locks on doors aren't illegal. Non-support of free video codecs with full support of AVC, AAC, and HEVC is illegal for free software in SN's home country because of patent law.

      • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Thursday August 16 2018, @12:45PM (4 children)

        by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Thursday August 16 2018, @12:45PM (#722150) Homepage Journal

        Erm, no. Not supporting free codecs is perfectly legal here, barring specific anti-trust rulings to the contrary.

        --
        My rights don't end where your fear begins.
        • (Score: 2) by Pino P on Thursday August 16 2018, @12:55PM (3 children)

          by Pino P (4721) on Thursday August 16 2018, @12:55PM (#722156) Journal

          An attacker would be able to distinguish your browser from Safari because Safari supports AVC, AAC, and HEVC, and your browser supports none of them.

          • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Thursday August 16 2018, @01:23PM (2 children)

            by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Thursday August 16 2018, @01:23PM (#722162) Homepage Journal

            Which has nothing to do with legality. I'm not seeing what you're trying to say here.

            --
            My rights don't end where your fear begins.
            • (Score: 2) by Pino P on Thursday August 16 2018, @01:57PM (1 child)

              by Pino P (4721) on Thursday August 16 2018, @01:57PM (#722177) Journal

              In this comment [soylentnews.org] you recommended that all free web browsers disguise themselves as Apple Safari by default. I'm saying that there are two methods of pretending to be Safari: one ineffective, the other civilly illegal to implement in free software. The ineffective one is not supporting nonfree codecs. The illegal one is supporting nonfree codecs. Which would you prefer that free web browsers adopt?