Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday August 16 2018, @06:43AM   Printer-friendly
from the trying-to-avoid-skynet? dept.

David Rosenthal has written a blog post on how end users may be affected by tort law. Specifically, he discusses two points in The Internet of Torts raised by Rebecca Crootof:

  • Introducing the Internet of Torts, in which she describes "how IoT devices empower companies at the expense of consumers and how extant law shields industry from liability."
  • Accountability for the Internet of Torts, in which she discusses "how new products liability law and fiduciary duties could be used to rectify this new power imbalance and ensure that IoT companies are held accountable for the harms they foreseeably cause."

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by PiMuNu on Thursday August 16 2018, @03:10PM (2 children)

    by PiMuNu (3823) on Thursday August 16 2018, @03:10PM (#722223)

    It is a good point BUT there is no coercive force either. You cannot charge for GPL products, only for support of said products (for which the liability is not waived).

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 16 2018, @03:18PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 16 2018, @03:18PM (#722231)

    The GPL does not say you can't charge for the GPL device. You can certainly charge someone for GPL software or devices with GPL firmware, you just are obligated to supply the source code when asked.

    • (Score: 2) by PiMuNu on Thursday August 16 2018, @03:48PM

      by PiMuNu (3823) on Thursday August 16 2018, @03:48PM (#722262)

      My bad, you are of course correct.

      My point was that it is possible for a sufficiently skilled person to build from source. On reflection I retract that as most people are not sufficiently skilled, so in the case of consumer devices that is not an option for the majority of users.

      I was commenting in another thread regarding the implications of hardware (IoT) vs software. That is relevant here but I won't reproduce the thread.