Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday August 16 2018, @08:20AM   Printer-friendly
from the but-lets-talk-about-their-aquaducts dept.

https://www.npr.org/2018/08/14/638462800/suspension-bridge-on-busy-highway-partially-collapses-in-genoa:

A long section of the towering Ponte Morandi Bridge completely collapsed in Genoa, Italy, on Tuesday, sending cars and trucks on the A10 highway crashing down below. Dozens of people died in the bridge failure, officials say.

As news emerged from the chaotic scene, the death toll fluctuated several times Tuesday. Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte said there were 22 dead, according to public broadcaster Rai News. But Italy's ANSA news agency has reported at least 37 people died, citing the fire brigade.

Workers have found bodies and vehicles in the massive amount of wreckage left by the collapse — and at least 11 people have been pulled from the rubble alive, Italian media report.

[...] The disaster struck shortly before noon, when one of the bridge's central pillars collapsed during a violent rainstorm. A witness told ANSA that lightning had struck the bridge before the collapse.

[...] The bridge was built in the late 1960s, at a length of more than 3,600 feet. It had recently been the subject of renovation and repair efforts. Italian roadway company Autostrade says the most recent work included consolidating the viaduct's base — a project that included installing a bridge crane.

Besides the obvious news value of this event, I'd be curious of any civil engineers or structural engineers could comment on the engineering behind such things. What causes these types of crumblings to happen, and exactly how reliable is infrastructure around the world?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by fraxinus-tree on Thursday August 16 2018, @08:14PM (2 children)

    by fraxinus-tree (5590) on Thursday August 16 2018, @08:14PM (#722471)

    A reasonable destructive test of a bridge is not only expensive. It is also way beyond current technology. The bridges do fail in many ways - including quakes, minor landslides, winds, ice buildup, material degradation, or a combination thereof. Bearing a static load is something pretty well known in a civil engineering and not usually at fault. And we clearly are not in a position to create a 100km/h wind for the whole bridge.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by realDonaldTrump on Thursday August 16 2018, @10:44PM (1 child)

    by realDonaldTrump (6614) on Thursday August 16 2018, @10:44PM (#722574) Homepage Journal

    There's something called the Wind Tunnel. Which our airplane companies use -- Lockheed, Boeing, Northrop Grumman. So their airplanes will be PERFECTO. And they make a VERY SMALL airplane that fits in the Wind Tunnel. But possibly they can't make a bridge that small!!!

    • (Score: 2) by Gaaark on Thursday August 16 2018, @11:02PM

      by Gaaark (41) on Thursday August 16 2018, @11:02PM (#722584) Journal

      If you stick your hand out the window while driving you have, in effect, a wind tunnel. But I hear you have small hands.
      :(

      --
      --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---