Ordinary wi-fi could be used to detect weapons and explosives in public places, according to a study led by the Rutgers University in New Jersey.
Wireless signals can penetrate bags to measure the dimensions of metal objects or estimate the volume of liquids, researchers claim. Initial tests appeared to show that the system was at least 95% accurate.
[...] The team behind the research tested 15 types of objects and six types of bags. The wi-fi system had success rates of 99% for recognising dangerous objects, 98% for metal and 95% for liquids. When objects were wrapped inside bags, the accuracy rate dropped to about 90%.
The low-cost system requires a wi-fi device with two or three antennas and can be integrated into existing wi-fi networks. The system works by analysing what happens when wireless signals penetrate and bounce off objects and materials.
(Score: 2) by PiMuNu on Friday August 17 2018, @01:39PM (2 children)
10 % false positive rate. Pulls on gloves. "Can you step this way Sir?"
(Score: 5, Interesting) by Bot on Friday August 17 2018, @02:23PM
Hey cut those scientists some slack. The TSA wanted at least 20% of false positives, better if among pretty females, but 10% is the most they could manage.
Account abandoned.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by Non Sequor on Friday August 17 2018, @08:27PM
As quoted, I think that’s a false negative rate, although I’m curious about false positives. We’re all familiar with the old Bayes’ law exercise about the implications of a 0.1% false positive rate on a test for a very rare condition.
Even without false positives (defined as identifying something outside of the RF absorption and dimensions specification for “weapons” being identified as being inside that specification) how common are objects that resemble weapons? Off the top of my head, I can’t think of any dead ringers, but I haven’t put that much thought into it.
Write your congressman. Tell him he sucks.