Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Saturday August 25 2018, @09:09AM   Printer-friendly
from the Worms,-Roxanne!-Worms! dept.

Submitted via IRC for SoyCow4408

Our brains have an "auto-correct" feature that we deploy when re-interpreting ambiguous sounds, a team of scientists has discovered. Its findings, which appear in the Journal of Neuroscience, point to new ways we use information and context to aid in speech comprehension.

"What a person thinks they hear does not always match the actual signals that reach the ear," explains Laura Gwilliams, a doctoral candidate in NYU's Department of Psychology, a researcher at the Neuroscience of Language Lab at NYU Abu Dhabi, and the paper's lead author. "This is because, our results suggest, the brain re-evaluates the interpretation of a speech sound at the moment that each subsequent speech sound is heard in order to update interpretations as necessary.

It's well known that the perception of a speech sound is determined by its surrounding context -- in the form of words, sentences, and other speech sounds. In many instances, this contextual information is heard later than the initial sensory input.

This plays out in every-day life -- when we talk, the actual speech we produce is often ambiguous. For example, when a friend says she has a "dent" in her car, you may hear "tent." Although this kind of ambiguity happens regularly, we, as listeners, are hardly aware of it.

"This is because the brain automatically resolves the ambiguity for us -- it picks an interpretation and that's what we perceive to hear," explains Gwilliams. "The way the brain does this is by using the surrounding context to narrow down the possibilities of what the speaker may mean."

In the Journal of Neuroscience study, the researchers sought to understand how the brain uses this subsequent information to modify our perception of what we initially heard.

To do this, they conducted a series of experiments in which the subjects listened to isolated syllables and similarly sounding words (e.g., barricade, parakeet). In order to gauge the subjects' brain activity, the scientists deployed magnetoencephalography (MEG), a technique that maps neural movement by recording magnetic fields generated by the electrical currents produced by our brain.

Their results yielded three primary findings:

  • The brain's primary auditory cortex is sensitive to how ambiguous a speech sound is at just 50 milliseconds after the sound's onset.
  • The brain "re-plays" previous speech sounds while interpreting subsequent ones, suggesting re-evaluation as the rest of the word unfolds
  • The brain makes commitments to its "best guess" of how to interpret the signal after about half a second.

Source: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/08/180822082637.htm


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by martyb on Saturday August 25 2018, @11:32AM (2 children)

    by martyb (76) Subscriber Badge on Saturday August 25 2018, @11:32AM (#726202) Journal

    When I was a kid and asked my mom how to spell a word, she would tell me "Look it up!" meaning that I was to go over to the dictionary and find the word in it. Well, how do you find a word if you don't know how to spell it? "Guess!" was her steadfast reply.

    sikology, nope. sykology. nope. sichology. nope. Yeah, you get the idea.

    If, after a determined effort I was unable to succeed, only then would she tell me the spelling. Something happened along the way, though. I'd see an illustration, or a bold-faced entry that caught my eye, and I'd read about it. Then I'd read the next one, and the next one. before I knew it, I'd just read another page or two in the dictionary.

    It is a complication when it comes to interpreting oral communications as I have far more 'decode fails' because of my large vocabulary (To, too, two; ate, eight, and so on.) So I frequently find myself backtracking while listening as I discover that I, yet again, guessed the wrong word instantiation for the sound I heard. (It does lead to a propensity towards puns.)

    So, I find that I can read *much* faster than I can listen.

    Sorry for the somewhat jumbled writing here, am rushing to get ready for work. Let me close with this little bon mot:

    Eye sea watt ewe deed dare.

    =)

    --
    Wit is intellect, dancing.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by wonkey_monkey on Saturday August 25 2018, @03:41PM

    by wonkey_monkey (279) on Saturday August 25 2018, @03:41PM (#726247) Homepage

    because of my large vocabulary (To, too, two; ate, eight, and so on.)

    Get you with your fancy words! Aye-guh-huh-tuh? Is that French?

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Ethanol-fueled on Saturday August 25 2018, @05:44PM

    by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Saturday August 25 2018, @05:44PM (#726270) Homepage

    My mom used to do the same thing to me. I would go grab the dictionary, then walk back over to her and slap her fucking face with it until she told me herself.