SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the this-news-is-terrible-and-I'm-gonna-need-a-drink dept.
No alcohol safe to drink, global study confirms
A large new global study published in the Lancet has confirmed previous research which has shown that there is no safe level of alcohol consumption. The researchers admit moderate drinking may protect against heart disease but found that the risk of cancer and other diseases outweighs these protections. A study author said its findings were the most significant to date because of the range of factors considered.
The Global Burden of Disease [open, DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31310-2] [DX] study looked at levels of alcohol use and its health effects in 195 countries, including the UK, between 1990 and 2016.
Analysing data from 15 to 95-year-olds, the researchers compared people who did not drink at all with those who had one alcoholic drink a day. They found that out of 100,000 non-drinkers, 914 would develop an alcohol-related health problem such as cancer or suffer an injury. But an extra four people would be affected if they drank one alcoholic drink a day. For people who had two alcoholic drinks a day, 63 more developed a condition within a year and for those who consumed five drinks every day, there was an increase of 338 people, who developed a health problem.
One of the study authors, Prof Sonia Saxena, a researcher at Imperial College London and a practising GP, said: "One drink a day does represent a small increased risk, but adjust that to the UK population as a whole and it represents a far bigger number, and most people are not drinking just one drink a day."
Related: The Truth We Won't Admit: Drinking is Healthy
Study Shows 3 Drinks a Day May Cause Liver Cancer
Even Moderate Drinking Linked to a Decline in Brain Health
American Society of Clinical Oncology: Alcohol Use Increases Risk of Cancer
(Score: 2) by requerdanos on Saturday August 25 2018, @04:58PM
And a way to counteract that stress-reducing benefit might be putting out scare studies saying there's "no safe" amount of alcohol and that one who consumes it should expect to be instantly vaporized, or sickened to death, or some such--that way, drinking the alcohol would have less stress-reducing benefit in proportion to the degree that the study is believed to be a true representation of reality.
It's better to look for patterns, such as the following, described by pseudocode below:
while 1=1 {
for x in [coffee alcohol marijuana rock-music etc.] {
wait (rand(1,5)) years;
boldly declare "Studies now show that $x in moderation is actually...";
y = rand(1,2);
if $y=1 then boldly declare "GOOD for you! \n";
if $y=2 then boldly declare "BAD for you! \n";
}
}
The meta-analyses of such studies will always be inconclusive at the rate they have been going. I don't think a single "alcohol is bad, mmmkay?" study is going to change that, but of course, I am no researcher myself.