Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Sunday August 26 2018, @02:53AM   Printer-friendly
from the smoke-gets-in-your-ears dept.

Submitted via IRC for SoyCow1984

Current noise cancelling technology comes in the form of headphones and earbuds. To cancel noise, these headphones emit an anti-noise signal to contrast the external sounds. The time available for the headphones to produce this anti-noise signal is extremely short. This results in some noise getting through, which is why all these devices must cover the entire ear with noise-canceling material. However, wearing such ear-blocking devices for long periods of time is not comfortable, and can even be harmful.

"Our goal is to not block the ear canal," said Sheng Shen, lead author and a Ph.D. candidate in the Coordinated Science Laboratory and Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE). "We envision a behind-the-ear device that still achieves noise cancellation as good as the best headphones or earbuds available today."

The main idea behind this research involves combining wireless IoT networks with noise cancellation. A microphone is placed in the environment that senses sounds and sends them over wireless signals to an earpiece. Since wireless signals travel a million times faster than sound, the earphone can receive the sound information much faster than the actual sound itself.

Source: Method to cancel noise without ear-blocking headphones


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by janrinok on Sunday August 26 2018, @08:44AM (3 children)

    by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Sunday August 26 2018, @08:44AM (#726485) Journal

    But adding the anti-phase signal to a sound that isn't bothering me from a microphone that is outside my office generates a sound that does bother me. Or is this using something else to counter noise?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by janrinok on Sunday August 26 2018, @08:55AM (2 children)

    by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Sunday August 26 2018, @08:55AM (#726488) Journal

    To cancel noise, these headphones emit an anti-noise signal to contrast the external sounds.

    Nope, same technology. And TFA explains that the microphone must be between the noise source and the user, and that a ring of microphones will be needed to provide all-round cancelling. Excuse me, the the current headsets work wherever you are, to the degree that any of this technology 'works' completely.

    So each user will require a ring of IoT devices to follow each of them around for this to work? Or perhaps by providing a mesh of devices they hope to be able to direct the appropriate signal levels to all the users within the coverage of that mesh. How will they do that without knowing where you are? Oh, I know - we will track all the ear devices so we have the necessary data to process the signals in real-time (in IoT devices? Yeah, sure). People will be happy to be tracked, won't they?

    It is a solution to a corner case that hasn't been thought through yet. Maybe one day it will, but not yet.

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by qzm on Sunday August 26 2018, @10:17AM (1 child)

      by qzm (3260) on Sunday August 26 2018, @10:17AM (#726497)

      The article is also full of pipe dreams.

      Why? Sound interacts, sound reflects, sound is rather nonlinear and complex in how it does these things.
      You would think they would know this, however I suspect they are electronics majors looking for IoT funding, rather than people with ANY experience in acoustics.

      • (Score: 2) by fyngyrz on Sunday August 26 2018, @01:54PM

        by fyngyrz (6567) on Sunday August 26 2018, @01:54PM (#726545) Journal

        There's another issue. The sound that reaches your inner ear - which is where we actually hear, is shaped by our external ear. A microphone behind the ear will not hear what you hear, and so its ability to cancel is inherently crippled - its version of out-of-phase will not match your ear's version of in-phase, and so the cancellation will be wrong to some degree, moreso than if it is done in the direct sound path.

        Noise cancelling headphones block a lot of what would have reached your ear, and work inside the same space as your external ear, so they can be reasonably effective.

        Noise-cancelling earbuds can do the same, because they catch what is coming in and so can cancel it, and they also block the path to your ear.

        How well this all works depends on several factors:

        • How well the external microphone can distinguish external sounds from the sounds the earbud/phone is making
        • How well the earbud/phone can acoustically isolate the space between it and the inner ear
        • The bandwidth, dynamic range, and phase accuracy of the emitter that actually drives the phase cancellation
        • The bandwidth, dynamic range, and phase accuracy or the microphone
        • The processing bandwidth of the system that does the phase cancellation and summing of the desired sound
        • The inherent noise of the system (I've used noise cancelling systems that were reasonably effective, but sported some seriously obnoxious hiss components, for instance.)

        It's not at all a given that the approach outlined in TFS is even remotely (hah) practical.