Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday August 27 2018, @04:27PM   Printer-friendly
from the can't-pass-this-up dept.

Earlier this month, MoviePass announced that its customers, previously allowed to see one movie per day, would be limited to just three per month. At the time, the company said that the change wouldn't affect annual subscribers until their plan renewed. But it looks like MoviePass has changed its mind yet again, and probably to nobody's surprise. The company began circulating an email today notifying annual plan subscribers that they too will be limited to just three film showings per month.

"As of today, aligned with Section 2.4 of our Terms of Use, your annual subscription plan will now allow you to see three movies a month instead of the previous unlimited offering, and you'll receive up to a $5 discount on any additional movie tickets purchased," the email said. "This is the current standard plan now in effect for all current and new subscribers." And because the move is retroactive for the current monthly period, which varies by customer, some users will find that they've already seen their three movies once they receive the notification email. The company claims it "intends" to expand its offering of blockbuster and independent films in light of the plan adjustments.

Source: https://www.engadget.com/2018/08/24/moviepass-annual-subscribers-three-movie-plan/


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 28 2018, @02:12AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 28 2018, @02:12AM (#727208)

    Except you're a fucking moron that still doesn't get it.

    That wasn't their plan, their plan was to get a large enough number of subscribers that they could fill seats in theater chains and negotiate a discount based upon the fact that they could A) fill those empty seats B) represented a form of advertising that theater chains pay for in other ways and pocket the difference and C) direct those movie goers to movies that they might otherwise skip even though they might be interested in the film based upon analytics.

    Just because you're so fucking stupid that you don't understand what they were planning on doing doesn't change the fact that it was at least plausible when they were doing the planning. Now, you're using the information about how it worked out in order to recast what the plans were to make yourself feel smart.

    Personally, I think it was a somewhat moronic idea in the first place, but it was at least somewhat plausible that it could have worked out. The main issue was that they promised too many viewings for the price with too few limitations and the results were more or less as one would expect.