Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:
Cedars-Sinai investigators have developed a simpler and more accurate method of estimating body fat than the widely used body mass index, or BMI, with the goal of better understanding obesity.
The new method is highlighted in a study published in Scientific Reports, one of the Nature journals.
"We wanted to identify a more reliable, simple and inexpensive method to assess body fat percentage without using sophisticated equipment," said the study leader, Orison Woolcott, MD, of Cedars-Sinai.
While the BMI is commonly accepted, many medical experts in the field of obesity consider it to be inaccurate because it cannot distinguish among bone mass, muscle mass and excess fat. BMI also does not account for the influence of gender -- women generally have more body fat than men.
[...] To determine relative fat mass (RFM), you need to measure your height as well as your waist circumference. To measure your waist, place the tape measure right at the top of the hip bone and reach it around your body for the most reliable result. Next, put those numbers into the relative fat mass equation -- making a ratio out of the height and waist measurements. The formula is adjusted for gender:
-- submitted from IRC
(Score: 2) by opinionated_science on Tuesday August 28 2018, @11:41AM (1 child)
the scales are fine - just trying a bit damp when you stand on them (say, after a shower).
The method uses a modulated current, as is actually not bad (0.5% error for mine).
You probably want to get your workout to time basis - say 1hr.
4 miles is not much of a workout for most decent runners, especially those of us who drink beer!!!!
(Score: 3, Funny) by sce7mjm on Wednesday August 29 2018, @04:26PM
I think it's my exercise to beer ratio I need to work on....