Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by chromas on Thursday August 30 2018, @07:20AM   Printer-friendly
from the can-you-read-me-now? dept.

Another week, another leak:

A misconfigured MongoDB server belonging to Abbyy, an optical character recognition software developer, allowed public access to customer files.

Independent security researcher Bob Diachenko discovered the database on August 19 hosted on the Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud platform. It was 142GB in size and it allowed access without the need to log in.

The sizeable database included scanned documents of the sensitive kind: contracts, non-disclosure agreements, internal letters, and memos. Included were more than 200,000 files from Abbyy customers who scanned the data and kept it at the ready in the cloud.

"Some collection names like 'documentRecognition,' or 'documentXML' hinted that database would be part of a data recognition company infrastructure," Diachenko writes in a blog post today.

[...] Volkswagen, Deloitte, PwC, PepsiCo, Sberbank, McDonald's are just a few of Abbyy's clients.

Should have used invisible ink.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 30 2018, @08:14AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 30 2018, @08:14AM (#728200)

    PS: can the non-disclosure agreement now be considered breached?

  • (Score: 2) by BsAtHome on Thursday August 30 2018, @10:03AM

    by BsAtHome (889) on Thursday August 30 2018, @10:03AM (#728217)

    If the disclosure of the existence of the NDA was specified, yes, that part would probably be void. At least, if you can argue that the breach caused the NDA to fall into wrong hands.

    The disclosure of other information covered under the NDA is much harder to argue. Such information is not specified in the NDA itself and you would need to prove that someone else has gathered the specific information from elsewhere (either from the breach or elsewhere). That burden is much higher.