Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday August 30 2018, @09:58PM   Printer-friendly
from the what-do-they-fear? dept.

Australia flags denying U.S. whistleblower Chelsea Manning entry visa

Australia has signaled it is preparing to ban U.S. whistleblower Chelsea Manning from entering the country ahead of a scheduled speaking tour, the organizer of the engagements said. Manning, the transgender U.S. Army soldier who served seven years in military prison for leaking classified data, is scheduled to speak at the Sydney Opera House at the weekend.

However, Suzi Jamil, owner of the company organizing Manning's speaking tour in Australia, said late on Wednesday Manning had received a notice from the Australian government informing her Canberra was considering cancelling her visa. [...] Australian law allows the immigration minister to deny anyone a visa if they do not pass a character test, a broad criteria that affords the government sweeping powers.

Manning is scheduled to travel to New Zealand after finishing her three events in Australia but the center-right opposition National Party has also called for her to be denied entry.

Also at NYT.

Related: Chelsea Manning Released from Prison, Remains on Active Duty Pending Appeal
Chelsea Manning, Newly Freed from Military Prison, Speaks in San Francisco


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Touché) by c0lo on Friday August 31 2018, @02:12AM (5 children)

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Friday August 31 2018, @02:12AM (#728554) Journal

    I'm a non-native-English speaker who lives in Australia as an Australian citizen. Have a good job here, pay my taxes and I recently bought a piece of acreage at country side with the intent of establishing a farm where only pasture used to be.
    .
    .
    .
    In case you don't get my point, let me spell it for you: in concerning to matters regarding Australia, I reckon I'm more invested in this country than you'll ever be. I have nothing to apologize to you when I object to your ideas of order that should be applicable to Australia, I'm in my full rights to do so even when those ideas would be coming from inside the govt.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=1, Touché=2, Total=3
    Extra 'Touché' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 31 2018, @02:52AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 31 2018, @02:52AM (#728567)

    "I have nothing to apologize to you when I object to your ideas of order that should be applicable to Australia,"

    .
    .

    Your reading comprehension is extremely poor.

    I didn't EVER suggest what sort of order should apply to Australia, I suggested the AUSTRALIAN
    GOVERNMENT may have ITS own ideas about order which motivate them to not want Manning to
    enter Australia.

    Can you not understand that I have no ideas about order but only a suspicion that
    the Australian government itself may have certain ideas about order ?

    Your English sucks and so do your manners.

    I'm done wasting my time on you, that's the end of this discussion.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 31 2018, @03:03AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 31 2018, @03:03AM (#728576)

      Hey you managed to not add some ridiculous insults that time and it seems your post has not been downmodded. Don't worry guy, other people get downmodded for blatant insults that don't actually help anything.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 31 2018, @05:47PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 31 2018, @05:47PM (#728860)

    I read down through this sub-thread. I seriously think that you read something into AC's comments that wasn't there. He's really not saying what he thinks Australia should do, or not do. He's pointing out that your government probably has an agenda which Manning could disturb. AC hasn't even hinted at what that agenda might be. Maybe it's something so simple as trying to stay on the "good side" of the US.

    Just lighten up, man. This AC seemed to make some reasonable observations about governments in general, and the Oz government in particular. I modded one of AC's posts up - and seriously thought about modding you down.

    • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Friday August 31 2018, @10:41PM (1 child)

      by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Friday August 31 2018, @10:41PM (#729010) Journal

      I would have interpreted that way, it if wasn't for the mixture of "Australian government" with "Australians".
      He starts with a note about the govt, then

      Maybe the Australians don't want Manning coming to their country stirring up shit. It would be perfectly reasonable of the Australians to take such a position,

      --
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 01 2018, @02:13PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 01 2018, @02:13PM (#729226)

        he/she/attackhelicopter/it started with "Maybe" so perhaps this isn't that bad