Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Saturday September 01 2018, @07:01AM   Printer-friendly
from the blame-humans-of-course dept.

New research has shown just how bad AI is at dealing with online trolls.

Such systems struggle to automatically flag nudity and violence, don’t understand text well enough to shoot down fake news and aren’t effective at detecting abusive comments from trolls hiding behind their keyboards.

A group of researchers from Aalto University and the University of Padua found this out when they tested seven state-of-the-art models used to detect hate speech. All of them failed to recognize foul language when subtle changes were made, according to a paper [PDF] on arXiv.

Adversarial examples can be created automatically by using algorithms to misspell certain words, swap characters for numbers or add random spaces between words or attach innocuous words such as ‘love’ in sentences.

The models failed to pick up on adversarial examples and successfully evaded detection. These tricks wouldn’t fool humans, but machine learning models are easily blindsighted. They can’t readily adapt to new information beyond what’s been spoonfed to them during the training process.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by realDonaldTrump on Saturday September 01 2018, @09:47PM (1 child)

    by realDonaldTrump (6614) on Saturday September 01 2018, @09:47PM (#729338) Homepage Journal

    When you disagree you say, "mod parent to oblivion!"

  • (Score: 2) by requerdanos on Saturday September 01 2018, @11:23PM

    by requerdanos (5997) Subscriber Badge on Saturday September 01 2018, @11:23PM (#729356) Journal

    There is a big difference between finding something objectionable because I disagree with it...and finding something objectionable because it's inappropriate for the context (such as the [spam] we've seen on discussions in this site).

    When you disagree you say, "mod parent to oblivion!"

    You've picked the wrong side: When I disagree I reply, or let it go. When it's junk that clutters up the thread, I mod down; when just spam, I mod spam. For repeat offender trolls that others are overly tempted to feed, you'll get a call to mod parent to oblivion.

    Thanks for noticing.