With rising sea levels, Bangkok struggles to stay afloat.
As Bangkok prepares to host climate-change talks, the sprawling city of more than 10 million is itself under siege from the environment, with dire forecasts warning it could be partially submerged in just over a decade.
[...] As temperatures rise, abnormal weather patterns—like more powerful cyclones, erratic rainfall, and intense droughts and floods—are predicted to worsen over time, adding pressure on governments tasked with bringing the 2015 Paris climate treaty to life.
Bangkok, built on once-marshy land about 1.5 metres (five feet) above sea level, is projected to be one of the world's hardest hit urban areas, alongside fellow Southeast Asian behemoths Jakarta and Manila.
"Nearly 40 percent" of Bangkok will be inundated by as early as 2030 due to extreme rainfall and changes in weather patterns, according to a World Bank report.
Currently, the capital "is sinking one to two centimetres a year and there is a risk of massive flooding in the near future," said Tara Buakamsri of Greenpeace.
(Score: 2, Interesting) by khallow on Monday September 03 2018, @11:34PM
I guess we have to look at the meaning [oxforddictionaries.com] of words, eh?
If you're making a distinction between "true" and "false" virtue signalling, then you're not getting the point of the term. Sure, it can be deceptive, delusional, or hypocritical, which I guess would be "false" virtue signalling. But even when it's true (that is, the person believes what they're saying and makes a good faith effort to be in compliance with the public presentation), it's an obnoxious "This is how good I am" message.