Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Wednesday September 05 2018, @04:22AM   Printer-friendly
from the sol-sol-la-sol-do-si dept.

Over in the EU Parliament, they're getting ready to vote yet again on the absolutely terrible Copyright Directive, which has serious problems for the future of the internet, including Article 13's mandatory censorship filters and Article 11's link tax. Regrading the mandatory filters, German music professor Ulrich Kaiser, has written about a a very disturbing experiment he ran on YouTube, in which he kept having public domain music he had uploaded for his students get taken down by ContentID copyright claims.

[...] I decided to open a different YouTube account “Labeltest” to share additional excerpts of copyright-free music. I quickly received ContentID notifications for copyright-free music by Bartok, Schubert, Puccini and Wagner. Again and again, YouTube told me that I was violating the copyright of these long-dead composers, despite all of my uploads existing in the public domain. I appealed each of these decisions, explaining that 1) the composers of these works had been dead for more than 70 years, 2) the recordings were first published before 1963, and 3) these takedown request did not provide justification in their property rights under the German Copyright Act.

I only received more notices, this time about a recording of Beethoven’s Symphony No.5, which was accompanied by the message: “Copyrighted content was found in your video. The claimant allows its content to be used in your YouTube video. However, advertisements may be displayed.” Once again, this was a mistaken notification. The recording was one by the Berlin Philharmonic under the direction of Lorin Maazel, which was released in 1961 and is therefore in the public domain. Seeking help, I emailed YouTube, but their reply, “[…] thank you for contacting Google Inc. Please note that due to the large number of enquiries, e-mails received at this e-mail address support-de@google.com cannot be read and acknowledged” was less than reassuring.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 05 2018, @06:58AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 05 2018, @06:58AM (#730639)

    Stop expecting Google to supply unlimited server and bandwidth resources.

    This is exactly what the content MAFIAA should do. Unfortuntaly they will certainly not quit their new favorite playground.

    This felow is a professor at a, one supposes, real educational institution. They have servers and bandwidth.

    Yes you can and often should host your own but it does not change the fact that youtube is seriously broken, because of the greed of MAFIAA and the greed of google.

    you can sue the ever loving bejesus out of them for making a false claim under oath, assuming the EU version of the laws resemble the DMCA here.

    Apparently the DMCA faces very similar issues. Sounds like perjury is a selectively enforced felony. DMCA#Abuse_of_takedown_notice [wikipedia.org]

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=1, Informative=2, Total=3
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   3