Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday September 06 2018, @03:28PM   Printer-friendly
from the Security-is-hard,-mmmmkay? dept.

Back when Intel introduced the 80286, they didn't quite document everything right away. Errata were needed. Then the 80386 changed things. And then someone convinced them to add just one more feature at the last minute, which didn't get documented properly again.

The History of a Security Hole takes a look at the problems introduced by the I/O Permission Bitmap (IOPB) in the 80286, and how fallout from the implementation caused a security hole in all versions of OpenBSD up to 6.3 and NetBSD up to 4.4.

Conclusion? This programming thing is hard.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Friday September 07 2018, @07:30PM

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Friday September 07 2018, @07:30PM (#731879) Journal

    You're right that you said most things.

    About microprocessors. If there is a development cost of x, which is 20% total cost for 80% correctness, and then 4x which is 80% of cost for remaining 20% correctness, then that 4x element is spread across billions of processors.

    --
    The lower I set my standards the more accomplishments I have.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2