Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday September 08 2018, @10:24AM   Printer-friendly
from the there-goes-the-neighborhood dept.

Pluto a Planet? New Research from UCF Suggests Yes

The reason Pluto lost its planet status is not valid, according to new research from the University of Central Florida in Orlando. In 2006, the International Astronomical Union, a global group of astronomy experts, established a definition of a planet that required it to "clear" its orbit, or in other words, be the largest gravitational force in its orbit. [...] [Philip] Metzger, who is lead author on the study, reviewed scientific literature from the past 200 years and found only one publication -- from 1802 -- that used the clearing-orbit requirement to classify planets, and it was based on since-disproven reasoning.

[...] The planetary scientist said that the literature review showed that the real division between planets and other celestial bodies, such as asteroids, occurred in the early 1950s when Gerard Kuiper published a paper that made the distinction based on how they were formed. However, even this reason is no longer considered a factor that determines if a celestial body is a planet, Metzger said.

[...] Instead, Metzger recommends classifying a planet based on if it is large enough that its gravity allows it to become spherical in shape. "And that's not just an arbitrary definition, Metzger said. "It turns out this is an important milestone in the evolution of a planetary body, because apparently when it happens, it initiates active geology in the body." Pluto, for instance, has an underground ocean, a multilayer atmosphere, organic compounds, evidence of ancient lakes and multiple moons, he said. "It's more dynamic and alive than Mars," Metzger said. "The only planet that has more complex geology is the Earth."

Planet Ceres, please.

The Reclassification of Asteroids from Planets to Non-Planets (DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2018.08.026) (DX)

Related: Pluto May Regain Status as Planet
Earth is a "Dwarf Planet" Because it has not Cleared its Orbit


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by requerdanos on Saturday September 08 2018, @04:25PM

    by requerdanos (5997) Subscriber Badge on Saturday September 08 2018, @04:25PM (#732242) Journal

    100 times worse at clearing their orbits than Mars

    Tell me about 100 times worse.

    If Mars clears 100% of its orbit, say, then something 1 times worse would clear 0% of its orbit and 100 times worse would clear -9000% of its orbit... If Mars clears 88% of its orbit, then something 1 times worse would clear 0% of its orbit and something 100 times worse would clear -8712% of its orbit...

    Clearly I am not understanding the concept of x times worse in a meaningful way, but you seem to understand it--would you help me to understand it?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2