Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by chromas on Monday September 10 2018, @07:20PM   Printer-friendly
from the maxwell's-systemd dept.

Could a 'demon' help create a quantum computer? Physicists implement a version of Maxwell's famous thought experiment for reducing entropy:

The second law of thermodynamics states that the entropy -- sometimes thought of as disorder -- of a system cannot decrease over time. One of the consequences of this law is that it precludes the possibility of a perpetual motion device. Around 1870, James Clerk Maxwell proposed a thought experiment in which a demon could open and close a gate between two chambers of gas, allowing warmer atoms to pass in one direction and cooler atoms to pass in the other. This sorting, which required no energy input, would result in a reduction of entropy in the system and a temperature difference between the two chambers that could be used as a heat pump to perform work, thus violating the second law.

"Later work has shown that the demon doesn't actually violate the second law and subsequently there have been many attempts to devise experimental systems that behave like the demon," said [physics professor David] Weiss. "There have been some successes at very small scales, but we've created a system in which we can manipulate a large number of atoms, organizing them in a way that reduces the system's entropy, just like the demon."

The researchers use lasers to trap and cool atoms in a three-dimensional lattice with 125 positions arranged as a 5 by 5 by 5 cube. They then randomly fill about half of the positions in the lattice with atoms. By adjusting the polarization of the laser traps, the researchers can move atoms individually or in groups, reorganizing the randomly distributed atoms to fully fill either 5 by 5 by 2 or 4 by 4 by 3 subsets of the lattice.

"Because the atoms are cooled to almost as low a temperature as possible, the entropy of the system is almost entirely defined by the random configuration of the atoms within the lattice," said Weiss. "In systems where the atoms are not super-cooled, the vibration of the atoms makes up the majority of the system's entropy. In such a system, organizing the atoms does little to change the entropy, but in our experiment, we show that organizing the atoms lowers the entropy within the system by a factor of about 2.4."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 10 2018, @09:49PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 10 2018, @09:49PM (#732930)

    Entropy, how can I explain it? I'll take it frame by frame it
    To have you all jump and shout and saying it
    Let's just say that it's a measure of disorder
    In a system that is closed, like with a border

    [...]

    [Chorus]
    You down with entropy? (Yeah, you know me!) (x3)
    Who's down with entropy? (Every last homey!)

    [...]

    Researchers always try to use the second law
    To create perpetual motion machines, but their theory has a flaw
    The second law is quite precise about where it applies
    Only in a closed system must the entropy count rise
    This experiment is not a closed system, it's powered by their lasers
    So fuck the damn researchers, Doomsday get my gun

    (With apologies to MC Hawking and Stephen Hawking, RIP)

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +2  
       Funny=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Funny' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by Thexalon on Tuesday September 11 2018, @12:20AM

    by Thexalon (636) on Tuesday September 11 2018, @12:20AM (#732988)

    At least link the original track: MC Hawking - Entropy [youtube.com]

    --
    The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.