Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Tuesday September 11 2018, @12:00AM   Printer-friendly
from the streaking-at-work dept.

International research team discovers career hot streaks occur in science, art and film:

A team of researchers [...] examined the works of nearly 30,000 scientists, artists and film directors to learn if high-impact works in those fields came in streaks.

According to Lu Liu, a doctoral student in the College of IST and member of the research team, they found a universal pattern.

"Around 90 percent of professionals in those industries have at least one hot hand, and some of them have two or even three," she said.

[...] Liu says that there are two previous schools of thought regarding hot streaks in individual careers. According to the "Matthew effect," the more famous you become, the more likely you'll have success later, which supports the existence of a hot streak. The other school of thought -- the random impact rule -- implies that the success of a career is primarily random and is primarily driven by levels of productivity.

"Our findings provide a different point of view regarding individual careers," said Liu. "We found a period when an individual performs better than his normal career, and that the timing of a hot streak is random."

The researchers also wanted to learn if individuals were more productive during their hot streak periods, which last an average of four to five years. Unexpectedly, they were not.

[...] "Individuals show no detectable change in productivity during hot streaks, despite the fact that their outputs in this period are significantly better than the median, suggesting that there is an endogenous shift in individual creativity when the hot streak occurs," wrote the team in their paper.

[...] As the research shows that hot streaks do in fact exist in creative careers, the researchers hope to apply the research methods to more domains, including musicians, inventors and entrepreneurs.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Tuesday September 11 2018, @04:18PM

    by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Tuesday September 11 2018, @04:18PM (#733184) Homepage Journal

    On the contrary, we should encourage sociopathic behavior in corporate executives. They're not the problem. They're just doing what they're allowed to get away with. This is what you want from a corporate executive. Ideology is all fine and good if your company is privately owned but corporations whose mission is to make money for their shareholders should have that as their primary goal.

    Pro-tip: If a sociopath can best achieve their goals by pandering to the ideology of their customers, that's exactly what they'll do. Check last week's news for Nike stories if you don't believe me.

    Your elected representatives, unelected bureaucrats, and politically appointed judges are where the problem lies and where accountability needs to be forced. They're the ones allowing abuse of the system.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2