Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Wednesday September 12 2018, @05:17PM   Printer-friendly
from the puns-about-Bluetooth-or-something dept.

Dubbed the Molar Mic, it's a small device that clips to your back teeth. The device is both microphone and "speaker," allowing the wearer to transmit without any conspicuous external microphone and receive with no visible headset or earpiece. Incoming sound is transmitted through the wearer's bone matter in the jaw and skull to the auditory nerves; outgoing sound is sent to a radio transmitter on the neck, and sent to another radio unit that can be concealed on the operator. From there, the signal can be sent anywhere.

The Molar Mic connects to its transmitter via near-field magnetic induction. It's similar to Bluetooth, encryptable, but more difficult to detect and able to pass through water.

Sonitus received early funding from In-Q-Tel, the nonprofit investment arm of the CIA, to develop the concept. Hadrovic declined to say whether CIA operatives had used the device in intelligence gathering. But the Molar Mic has seen the dust of Afghanistan and even played a role in rescue operations in the United States.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by rigrig on Wednesday September 12 2018, @10:47PM

    by rigrig (5129) <soylentnews@tubul.net> on Wednesday September 12 2018, @10:47PM (#733883) Homepage

    This does look like interesting tech, both using your bone structure to couple sound, and using PSK instead of ASK seems like a sensible improvement over NFC (because someone realised the use case isn't "put as-cheap-as-possible RFID chips on everything" anymore).
    Too bad about the marketmangling speak in the article.

    Some red flags:

    • able to pass through water

      If the transmitter is in your mouth and you're wearing the receiver, all you care about is "able to pass through human tissue".

    • The power density of NFMI signals attenuate at a rate inversely proportional to the distance to the sixth power compared to the second power for Bluetooth signals. This means for the same distance, the power density of NFMI signals is 10000 times weaker than Bluetooth signals provided that both transmitting power are equal.

      Only if that distance is 10cm.

    • Somehow this comparison table [futureelectronics.com] mentions "Peak Current Consumption" but nothing like "power consumption" or "typical/average" consumption.
      And if the range is "Up to 3m", why do you need to wear a repeater around your neck?
    --
    No one remembers the singer.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2