Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday September 18 2018, @09:59PM   Printer-friendly
from the Big-oops-made-big-booms dept.

Pipe pressure before gas explosions was 12 times too high

The pressure in natural gas pipelines prior to a series of explosions and fires in Massachusetts last week was 12 times higher than it should have been, according to a letter from the state's U.S. senators to executives of the utility in charge of the pipelines.

Democratic U.S. Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Edward Markey sent the letter Monday seeking answers about the explosions from the heads of Columbia Gas, the company that serves the communities of Lawrence, Andover and North Andover, and NiSource, the parent company of Columbia Gas.

"The federal Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration has reported that the pressure in the Columbia Gas system should have been around 0.5 pounds per square inch (PSI), but readings in the area reached at least 6 PSI — twelve times higher than the system was intended to hold," the letter said.

The pressure spike registered in a Columbia Gas control room in Ohio, the senators said in the letter, which requests a reply by Wednesday.

See also: Columbia Gas pledges $10M toward relief efforts in Lawrence, Andover, North Andover

Previously: 60-80 Homes Burn; Gas Line "Incident" in Northern Massachusetts


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by urza9814 on Wednesday September 19 2018, @02:09PM (1 child)

    by urza9814 (3954) on Wednesday September 19 2018, @02:09PM (#737030) Journal

    OK, so let's suppose they do want to pass a law to prevent this in the future. You claim that the details about how it happened this time are none of their damn business, so how exactly are they supposed to prevent it in the future without knowing how it happened in the past?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Wednesday September 19 2018, @05:27PM

    by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Wednesday September 19 2018, @05:27PM (#737126) Homepage Journal

    In fact, no. That is a valid concern of theirs if they can manage to weasel their way into having some authority over what is primarily a local matter. Should they manage that, they need to grab a big ole cup of Shut The Fuck Up until those with primary responsibility and authority have done their jobs. Then, by all means, hold hearings focused specifically on what they have the authority to do something about. Grabbing the microphone away from the people who are actually in charge and might bear actual responsibility for the sake of getting on camera is a dick move though.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.