Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Wednesday September 19 2018, @08:00AM   Printer-friendly
from the logical-deduction dept.

An exoplanet with a minimum mass of 8.47±0.47 Earth masses has been discovered around 40 Eridani A:

"Star Trek's" planet Vulcan, ancestral home of Spock and his species, just became a little more real, thanks to a team of exoplanet scientists. Because "Star Trek" creators eventually associated planet Vulcan with a real star, called 40 Eridani A, scientists have wondered for years whether a factual equivalent of the beloved science fiction planet exists, with or without pointy-eared inhabitants. And now, a team of scientists has said that the star really does host at least one planet.

"This star can be seen with the naked eye, unlike the host stars of most of the known planets discovered to date," Bo Ma, lead author of the new research and an astronomer at the University of Florida, said in a statement. "Now, anyone can see 40 Eridani A on a clear night and be proud to point out Spock's home." That star, located about 16 light-years away from Earth, is also known as HD 26965. It's a bit orange, because it's a little smaller and cooler than our sun. But it also has some clear similarities to Earth's star: It's about the same age and sports a fairly similar sunspot pattern.

Also at Science Magazine.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Wednesday September 19 2018, @05:45PM (1 child)

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Wednesday September 19 2018, @05:45PM (#737139) Journal

    heavier than Neptune

    What is that supposed to mean? It is less massive than Neptune, and we don't know about the density since the radius is unknown. It could have a low density from being a puffed-up gas dwarf, or a high density for being a former gas giant with the gas blown away.

    but it likely means there's no habitable planet in that system

    Nobody has ruled out additional planets around this star, with greater orbital periods.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by HiThere on Wednesday September 19 2018, @11:02PM

    by HiThere (866) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday September 19 2018, @11:02PM (#737286) Journal

    OK, you're right. That's about half Neptune's mass. I must have mis-read a Google search. That still puts it more at the gas giant size than the rocky size...though it's smaller than anything in this system. Perhaps it's hot enough to have lost most of its Hydrogen, though, so I guess it could be a bit rocky. Of course, the current theory says that the larger planets for far out and then migrate inwards, destabilizing the orbits of all the smaller planets as they come in. I don't know how certain that theory is, however, even for the local system, but if it applies to this planet's system, there won't be any habitable planets. OTOH, the resonances from this planet should be a lot weaker than those of Jupiter, so...

    But at 8 Earth masses, it's not going to have a chemistry similar to one we know. I suspect it would retain Hydrogen released by splitting long enough for it to recombine, even near to top of the atmosphere. This despite the higher temperature. So the chemistry would probably be a lot more similar to that of Neptune despite the higher temperature.

    --
    Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.