Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Wednesday September 19 2018, @05:32PM   Printer-friendly
from the step-it-up dept.

Submitted via IRC for Fnord666

World speed record for polymer simulations shattered by over a hundred-fold

"5D Entanglement in Star Polymer Dynamics," by Airidas Korolkovas [was] published in Advanced Theory and Simulations, a new journal focusing on breakthroughs in the science of modelling. A unique computer algorithm was invented to capture the billions of steps needed for entangled polymers. It runs on a Graphical Processing Unit (GPU) and takes advantage of texture mapping, an often-overlooked functionality. Originally, this feature was designed for video games, but here it has been repurposed to calculate the molecular forces inside a little polymer droplet. Using a streamlined physics model, this simulation runs hundreds of times faster than traditional code. It opens new horizons on the time scales that can be addressed in scientific computing. This can further push the frontiers for the latest generation of supercomputers, like the recently opened Summit in Oak Ridge National Lab, USA, which has almost 30,000 GPUs.

The effect of higher dimensional entanglement can be observed in real life, using an instrument called neutron spin-echo. This machine shoots tiny subatomic particles, called neutrons, and listens to the echo of their nuclear spin as they scatter, or bounce off the polymer sample. A prime example is the IN15 beamline at the Institut Laue-Langevin, France, where the entanglement of linear polymers was first discovered. Thanks to constant upgrades and to upcoming new facilities like the European Spallation Source, Sweden, an experimental proof of the simulation prediction for star polymers may soon be within reach. A combination of high performance computing and neutron scattering is a powerful tool of discovery for new materials that improve our quality of life and respect the environment.

5D Entanglement in Star Polymer Dynamics (DOI: 10.1002/adts.201800078) (DX)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Touché) by bart9h on Wednesday September 19 2018, @08:10PM (3 children)

    by bart9h (767) on Wednesday September 19 2018, @08:10PM (#737190)

    tiny subatomic particles, called neutrons

    Aren't neutrons, by far, the largest subatomic particles?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Touché=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Touché' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by suburbanitemediocrity on Wednesday September 19 2018, @08:21PM (1 child)

    by suburbanitemediocrity (6844) on Wednesday September 19 2018, @08:21PM (#737195)

    It's empty space all the way down.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 19 2018, @09:05PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 19 2018, @09:05PM (#737223)

      as someone that should be more famous than Einstein said :

      there is a lot of room at the bottom

  • (Score: 2) by Immerman on Wednesday September 19 2018, @10:08PM

    by Immerman (3985) on Wednesday September 19 2018, @10:08PM (#737260)

    Well, at least until you get down to quarks, which are mostly far more massive than the particles made of them. Though if you're talking diameter rather than mass, then it sounds like quarks are pointlike down to the limits of our ability to measure them.