SoylentNews

Famed Mathematician Claims Proof of 160-Year-Old Riemann Hypothesis

posted by takyon on Saturday September 22 2018, @06:35AM   
from the non-trivial dept.

AnonTechie writes:

One of the most important unsolved problems in mathematics may have been solved, retired mathematician Michael Atiyah is set to claim on Monday. In a talk at the Heidelberg Laureate Forum in Germany, Atiyah will present what he refers to as a "simple proof" of the Riemann hypothesis, a problem which has eluded mathematicians for almost 160 years.

Born in 1929, Atiyah is one of the UK's most eminent mathematical figures, having received the two awards often referred to as the Nobel prizes of mathematics, the Fields medal and the Abel Prize. He also, at various times, served as president of the London Mathematical Society, the Royal Society and the Royal Society of Edinburgh.

If a solution to the Riemann hypothesis is confirmed, it would be big news. Among other things, the hypothesis is intimately connected to the distribution of prime numbers, those indivisible by any whole number other than themselves and one. If the hypothesis is proven to be correct, mathematicians would be armed with a map to the location of all such prime numbers, a breakthrough with far-reaching repercussions in the field.

New Scientist

[ALSO COVERED BY]:

Sir Atiyah's conference on the Riemann Hypothesis

Michael Atiyah and the Reimann hypothesis

[RELATED]:

Millennium Problems

---

Original Submission

• Re:Why? Re:Why? (Score: 4, Interesting) by Lester on Saturday September 22 2018, @11:28AM (1 child)

  by Lester (6231) on Saturday September 22 2018, @11:28AM (#738519) Journal

  A mathematician may have been working for years assuming the hypothesis is true. If the hypothesis is wrong, he is nowhere and has wasted a lot of time. But if the hypothesis is true, he is where nobody has ever been before.

  It is related to primes and so probably related to encryption. Let's suppose he works for NSA or KGB. The organizations that had mathematicians working assuming the hypothesis is true have now a big advantage. I bet they have a lot of people working on this and other not yet probed hypothesis. And maybe applying them as long as empirical results are correct so far.

  Parent

  Starting Score:	1		point
  Moderation		+2
  Interesting=2, Total=2
  Extra 'Interesting' Modifier		0
  Karma-Bonus Modifier		+1
  Total Score:		4

• Re:Why? (Score: 3, Insightful) by ants_in_pants on Sunday September 23 2018, @12:53AM

  by ants_in_pants (6665) on Sunday September 23 2018, @12:53AM (#738706)

  RH really isn't relevant to cryptography. If its truth/falseness were related to prime factorization, it would be, but as far as I know it's not.

  Also, in this case RH should be a given for anybody doing anything practical involving it. No counterexample has ever been found.

  --
  -Love, ants_in_pants

  Parent