Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday September 25 2018, @12:05AM   Printer-friendly
from the competition++ dept.

Zhaoxin Displays x86-Compatible KaiXian KX-6000: 8 Cores, 3 GHz, 16 nm FinFET

Zhaoxin, a joint venture between Via Technologies and the Chinese government, this week for the first time displayed its upcoming x86-compatible CPU, the KaiXian KX-6000. The SoC features eight cores running at 3 GHz and increases performance over its predecessor by at least 50%.

The KaiXian KX-6000 is a successor to the KX-5000 CPU launched earlier this year. Both chips integrate eight-core x86-64 cores with 8 MB of L2 cache, a DirectX 11.1-capable iGPU with an up-to-date display controller, a dual-channel DDR4-3200 memory controller, contemporary I/O interfaces (PCIe, SATA, USB, etc), and so on. The key differences between the KaiXian KX-5000 and the KaiXian KX-6000 are frequencies and manufacturing technology: the former is produced using TSMC's 28 nm fabrication process and runs at up to 2 GHz, whereas the latter is made using TSMC's 16 nm technology and operates at up to 3 GHz. Zhaoxin claims that the Kaixian KX-6000 offers compute performance comparable to that of Intel's 7th Generation Core i5 processor, which is a quad-core non-Hyper-Threaded CPU. Obviously, performance claims like that have to be verified, yet a 50% performance bump over the direct predecessor already seems beefy enough.

Related: Russia Plans to Dump Some American CPUs for Homegrown Technology
Russian Homegrown Elbrus-4C CPU Released
U.S. Export Restrictions Lead to Chinese Homegrown Supercomputing Chips
Linux-Based, MIPS-Powered Russian All-in-One PC Launched
China Dominates TOP500 List, Leads With New 93 Petaflops Supercomputer
Chinese Company Produces Chips Closely Based on AMD's Zen Microarchitecture


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by MichaelDavidCrawford on Tuesday September 25 2018, @02:33AM (3 children)

    by MichaelDavidCrawford (2339) Subscriber Badge <mdcrawford@gmail.com> on Tuesday September 25 2018, @02:33AM (#739503) Homepage Journal

    Googling seems to indicate that some i5s have it while some don't.

    My Mid 2014 Mac mini Model Identifier Macmini7,1 is slow as molasses. It works great for developing drivers because they don't have much source code, while I use me $$$ Quad Core i7 MacBook Pro as my testing target because it boots really fast.

    If my mini indeed doesn't have hyperthreading, that would explain some of the slowness.

    Another reason my Pro boots so fast is that it doesn't have SATA storage - neither rotating nor Flash - rather its storage is Flash on a PCIe card. My mini has rotating media.

    I actually managed to find an external USB3 enclosure for my 2012 MacBook Pro's PCIe flash. That's a very narrow market segment but happily it enabled me to recover my data when that box Drank The Kool-Ade.

    --
    Yes I Have No Bananas. [gofundme.com]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by seeprime on Tuesday September 25 2018, @04:36AM (2 children)

    by seeprime (5580) on Tuesday September 25 2018, @04:36AM (#739546)

    It sounds like you need to clone your Mini's hard drive onto a solid state drive, which are cheat enough to buy in larger sizes today. The data transfer rate will increase by 300 to 400%. The hard drive is the performance bottleneck.

    • (Score: 2) by MichaelDavidCrawford on Tuesday September 25 2018, @05:21AM (1 child)

      by MichaelDavidCrawford (2339) Subscriber Badge <mdcrawford@gmail.com> on Tuesday September 25 2018, @05:21AM (#739553) Homepage Journal

      I actually bought a 1 TB Western Digital USB 3 Flash drive for a song, but I'm using it for backup and file transfer.

      I expect I'll buy a Thunderbolt 2 SSD Drive [macsales.com], but not until I buy an HDMI monitor.

      My mini just has two Thundbolt ports; presently I'm using a VGA with a Thunderbolt to VGA adapter, with my other Thunderbolt port being taken up by a Firewire adapter that I use for two-machine debugging.

      The guy at the desk next to me has the Jesus Big inwardly curved monitor. He tells me that once you try such a monitor "there is no going back", however I really don't need that much screen real estate.

      --
      Yes I Have No Bananas. [gofundme.com]
      • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Freeman on Tuesday September 25 2018, @08:52PM

        by Freeman (732) on Tuesday September 25 2018, @08:52PM (#739864) Journal

        I've not afforded a new monitor as a 32" 720p LCD has been plenty for me. Now, you can get a similar one for near $200. It's quite nice to have a screen of that size. Much larger and it really starts to be too large for a desktop machine.

        --
        Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"