SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the http://i.imgur.com/z4z67Ur.gif dept.
Opinion | Let Teenagers Sleep In
Three out of every four students in grades 9 to 12 fail to sleep the minimum of eight hours that the American Academy of Sleep Medicine recommends for their age group. And sleep deprivation is unremittingly bad news. Anyone who talks about sleep as if it's some kind of inconvenience and getting less of it is a virtue should be challenged. These people are dangerous.
At its most basic, insufficient sleep results in reduced attention and impaired memory, hindering student progress and lowering grades. More alarmingly, sleep deprivation is likely to lead to mood and emotional problems, increasing the risk of mental illness. Chronic sleep deprivation is also a major risk factor for obesity, Type 2 diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease and cancer. As if this weren't enough, it also makes falling asleep at the wheel much more likely.
In 2014, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended that middle and high schools start no earlier than 8:30 a.m., a policy now backed by the American Medical Association, the C.D.C. and many other health organizations.
[...] Whenever schools have managed the transition to a later start time, students get more sleep, attendance goes up, grades improve and there is a significant reduction in car accidents. The RAND Corporation estimated that opening school doors after 8:30 a.m. would contribute at least $83 billion to the national economy within a decade through improved educational outcomes and reduced car crash rates. The Brookings Institution calculates that later school start times would lead to an average increase in lifetime earnings of $17,500.
(Score: 5, Interesting) by c0lo on Tuesday September 25 2018, @08:27AM (11 children)
Heh. Ages you say? How about adding another one: the economic independence age [forbes.com]?
Apropos "big purchases" - here's a nice chart of productivity vs wages '48 to '13 [imgix.net]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
(Score: 2, Troll) by Phoenix666 on Tuesday September 25 2018, @10:32AM (2 children)
It is hard to afford cars and homes when you spend all your money on beard oil.
Washington DC delenda est.
(Score: 5, Touché) by c0lo on Tuesday September 25 2018, @10:38AM (1 child)
So true. When all your disposable income is the $3 worth of beard oil, there's no way in hell you can afford a car.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
(Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Wednesday September 26 2018, @01:54PM
It's artisanal.
Washington DC delenda est.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by Gaaark on Tuesday September 25 2018, @02:55PM (6 children)
So, what changed in the Nixon/Ford era that began this?
What laws changed?
What did lobbyists get?
--- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
(Score: 2) by c0lo on Tuesday September 25 2018, @03:32PM (3 children)
I don't know.
Maybe they tricked Nixon into thinking "conservative" and "conservationist" are the same so he set up EPA [wikipedia.org]?
(large grin)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
(Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Wednesday September 26 2018, @01:52AM (2 children)
They more or less are by definition if not in practice. Conservatives' fundamental characteristic is wanting things to change as little as possible. That includes the environment.
My rights don't end where your fear begins.
(Score: 2) by c0lo on Wednesday September 26 2018, @02:41AM (1 child)
Meh, theoretically.
In real life, this leads to a paradoxes via
Honestly, can you say you don't see this mindset quite common in the "conservatives" of today?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
(Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Wednesday September 26 2018, @01:22PM
Oh it's common enough. It also means I don't consider them actual conservatives any more than I consider progressives to be actual liberals though.
My rights don't end where your fear begins.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 25 2018, @07:37PM (1 child)
Computerization and lessened need for human labor?
The loss of the Vietnam War and needing to let the US dollar float?
Opening to mainland China and cheap imports from Asia?
Exhausted energy sources in the US, and unionization of foreign oil suppliers?
(Score: 2) by Gaaark on Tuesday September 25 2018, @09:07PM
I'd add the destruction of unions in North America as well.
--- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
(Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday September 25 2018, @10:07PM
The real problem isn't that wages are moderately stagnant, but rather that developed world societies are geared towards increasing the cost of living (with the US taking the lead in a number of ways). A common example is high cost of real estate. Notice the use of the words "home", "housing", etc in the quote you inserted? Residential real estate in the US went up a lot more than wages did - it crudely tripled [cnbc.com] over the 1948-2013 period in the US, adjusted for inflation while wages only doubled.