Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday September 25 2018, @04:39PM   Printer-friendly
from the chilling-news dept.

MIT researchers have developed a completely passive, solar-powered way of combating ice buildup. The system is remarkably simple, based on a three-layered material that can be applied or even sprayed onto the surfaces to be treated.

It collects solar radiation, converts it to heat, and spreads that heat around so that the melting is not just confined to the areas exposed directly to the sunlight. And, once applied, it requires no further action or power source. It can even do its de-icing work at night, using artificial lighting.

Icing is a major problem for aircraft, for wind turbines, power lines, offshore oil platforms, and many other places. The conventional ways of getting around it are de-icing sprays or by heating, but those have issues.

The team has achieved with the three-layered material they've developed. The top layer is an absorber, which traps incoming sunlight and converts it to heat. The three layers, all made of inexpensive commercially available material, are then bonded together, and can be bonded to the surface that needs to be protected. For some applications, the materials could instead be sprayed onto a surface.

[...] The system could find even wider commercial uses, such as panels to prevent icing on roofs of homes, schools, and other buildings.

http://www.rtoz.org/2018/09/08/a-new-way-to-remove-ice-buildup-without-power-or-chemicals/

Also at http://news.mit.edu/2018/remove-ice-buildup-airplanes-wind-turbines-solar-power-0831


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 26 2018, @01:41PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 26 2018, @01:41PM (#740161)

    OP here, thanks for your comments.

    This makes sense, so why isn't this simple control strategy used? Adding a temp sensor can't cost very much and these home units already have a processor in them to read the "humidity sensor", run the display and timer.
    Playing the manufacturer for a moment, I suppose it's another thing to be assembled so it would add cost, and it's also another point of failure (more warranty costs).

  • (Score: 1) by WolvesOfTheNight on Wednesday September 26 2018, @06:30PM (1 child)

    by WolvesOfTheNight (4704) on Wednesday September 26 2018, @06:30PM (#740367)

    My guess is that it sometimes is used. I am not sure how hard it would be to characterize the temperature behavior of the system to correctly trigger deicing. There may be confounding factors, such as extreme outside (or inside) temperatures changing the average system temperature enough to mess with the control system. Also, you may have trouble with partial deicing or over deicing (heating up the contents). But it sounds like a pretty straight forward approach.

    I recall seeing what I thought was a thermometer on the return side of an evaporator when I was fixing my refrigerator. But I am not currently interested enough in the topic to really dig into it at the moment (I read up on the impedance approach to detecting ice while working on something else). A quick search on Google scholar found several approaches being used for triggering a de-icing mechanism on a refrigerator, mostly in patent fillings. At a glance, they involved either a timer or some form of ice detection, but I didn't dig into them. Might be worth a check if you are really interested. Or maybe you can find a text on refrigerator design somewhere...

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 28 2018, @02:39AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 28 2018, @02:39AM (#741168)

      Most refrigerators and dehumidifiers use timers or temp sensors, as they are the simplest and accurate enough for those approaches. My guess, based on what OP said, is that his units are probably 5-10 years old and have leaked a large amount of refrigerant. The problem with thermometer feedback systems is that they cannot properly adapt to low refrigerant levels. The reason why is that leaking refrigerant causes the pressure in the evaporator it decrease too much, which means the cool side is too cold. The thermometer, therefore, never triggers the appropriate temperature rise to trigger de-icing without larger amounts of ice present, which leads to a even more problems. Basically, as the pressure levels in the system drop, the dehumidifier gets too cold and ices over causes damage to the coils and the heat sink through both physical and chemical processes. This causes the process to accelerate as the microscopic holes increase in number and size. This causes the pressure to drop, causing lower operating temps. And on and on. It is made worse by the fact that many old dehumidifiers don't run the fan during the warm cycle, slowing melting and skewing temp reads.

      TL;DR replace your dehumidifier with a properly sized new unit and thank me later.