Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 16 submissions in the queue.
posted by takyon on Wednesday September 26 2018, @05:57PM   Printer-friendly
from the 100-to-1 dept.

Instagram Co-Founders to Step Down From Facebook

The two co-founders of Facebook Inc.'s popular Instagram app are stepping down, a move marking continued tumult at the social-networking giant.

The co-founders—Kevin Systrom, Instagram's chief executive, and Mike Krieger, chief technology officer—clashed with Facebook executives over the extent of Instagram's autonomy in recent months, according to people familiar with the matter. Earlier this year, Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg shifted a senior Facebook executive, Adam Mosseri, over to Instagram in anticipation that the founders might leave, one of the people said.

Among other things, Facebook officials, including Mr. Zuckerberg, clashed with the co-founders over growth tactics and how to more rapidly expand the photo-sharing app's user base, another person said. Senior Facebook officials had known the two men were frustrated working within a large company and had begun making preparations for them to leave, another person familiar with the matter said.

Also at NYT, The Atlantic, and Gizmodo.

See also: Facebook's Terrible Year Hits a New Low: The departure of Instagram's founders is a particularly painful sting during a truly rotten year.

Related: Facebook's Instagram Valued at $100 Billion (It Was Purchased for $1 Billion)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday September 27 2018, @03:59AM (3 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday September 27 2018, @03:59AM (#740634) Journal

    Faceplant more than 99%?

    Well, since you asked, 100% is quite possible. Stockholders are at the very bottom of the bankruptcy food chain.

    What are the chances of that do you think?

    Higher for companies where insiders are leaving. Just saying.

    Secondly, you're absolutely wrong in your estimation of me; I spend a fuck load more time than you on this website defending wealth creation, inheritance, and Capitalism, the sanctity of private property, and indeed the virtue of self-interest. How could you be so wrong? Well, I'll tell you: Your personal philosophy is inconsistent, and thus you are led easily to poor conclusions.

    If you really did, then you would know there's no such thing as an I-win button in such a situation. There are always downsides. And if he's turning down $850 million, it's probably because he knows a lot more about the situation and his personal priorities than you do.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 27 2018, @05:12AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 27 2018, @05:12AM (#740668)

    It's right there:

    It was totally selfish just to leave that money in Zuck's hands.

    The OP is saying that Acton thought to himself "850 million? I'm a billionaire almost 4 times over. I don't NEED this trouble; I quit." It would have been much more selfless and much more aligned with his disdain for Facebook if he had instead gritted his teeth and stomached the pain for however long it took to get his hands on that 850 million, and thereby have an enormous war chest to help pay for undoing that damage that he admits he helped cause. Instead, he's off not only soothing his own needs, but leaving that large some of resources in the control of Facebook.

    DO YOU GET IT YET?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 27 2018, @02:06PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 27 2018, @02:06PM (#740780)

      It would have been selfless to engage himself against what he's determined his best self-interest is?! Some defender of the "virtue of self-interest" you are!

    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday September 28 2018, @04:23AM

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday September 28 2018, @04:23AM (#741201) Journal

      It would have been much more selfless and much more aligned with his disdain for Facebook if he had instead gritted his teeth and stomached the pain for however long it took to get his hands on that 850 million, and thereby have an enormous war chest to help pay for undoing that damage that he admits he helped cause.

      Stupid != selfless.

      DO YOU GET IT YET?

      Yes. I get that is a really dumb argument.