Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Thursday September 27 2018, @08:23AM   Printer-friendly
from the British-Invasion's-royalties dept.

From Billboard:

The Music Modernization Act is not the law of the land yet, but it's pretty damn close, as the House of Representatives today (Sept. 25) unanimously approved passage of the U.S. Senate's version of the bill, which had itself been approved by that chamber last week. Now, the MMA is off to the White House where it will await the signature of President Donald Trump before becoming the law of the land.

The legislation forged by compromises throughout the music industry creates a blanket mechanical license and a collective to administer it, while changing some of the considerations used in setting music publishing rates. It also compels digital and satellite radio to pay a royalty on pre-1972 master recordings to labels and artists and it codifies the procedure by which SoundExchange can pay producers and engineers royalties for the records it works on.

From Engadget:

MMA will update rules regarding royalties and licensing when it comes to streaming in an effort to make sure creators are properly compensated. It will lead to the creation of a publicly-accessible database that makes it easier to see which publishers and artists need to be compensated for particular songs. Further, it will update the royalty rates for artists behind pre-1972 songs and will update royalty rates to reflect market changes all around.

[...] The president is now expected to sign it into law over the next ten days.

The bill: S.2823 - Music Modernization Act

Previously: Senate Passes Copyright Bill to End 140-Year Protection for Old Songs


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Thursday September 27 2018, @03:39PM

    by Phoenix666 (552) on Thursday September 27 2018, @03:39PM (#740825) Journal

    Well put. In this debate, and perhaps in many others, possession is 9/10th's of the law. That is, no matter what the status quo would like to enforce, facts on the ground will beat them every time. So if we don't like what the recording "industry" and movie "industry" are doing, using our government against us and common sense, then the best thing to do is to is to make them technologically and materially irrelevant.

    We're nearly there with content industries. It's about to begin in earnest with material culture--the guy uploading diagrams for 3D printing guns is a precursor.

    Folks in technology have a pivotal role to play in this sea change in how humans shape the world around them. I hope they infuse their work, their contribution, with FLOSS principles.

    --
    Washington DC delenda est.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2