Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday October 05 2018, @03:21PM   Printer-friendly
from the boss-wants-to-see-how-you-handle-pressure? dept.

I recently applied for a job in Silicon Valley.

The recruiter had me take a battery of tests that measured my verbal, mathematical and visual aptitude. I'd guess it was a mini-IQ test; it wasn't a mini-MMPI. As a result of the tests I was invited to interview onsite.

At the end of the interview the manager declared that he wanted me to take some tests.

His tests were brain teasers he had downloaded from a random website. The brain teasers had nothing to do with the work I was interviewing for. He seemed to ignore the battery of sophisticated tests I had been subjected to, and to believe that he could do better.

What is the REAL purpose of using brain teasers during an employment interview?

Is it just to make the candidate feel stupid? Are any of these people qualified to interpret the results? Are any of them industrial psychologists? Or is this all about power and control?

Please advise.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 05 2018, @04:33PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 05 2018, @04:33PM (#744681)

    Most algorithms of any note are designed slowly, as the concepts and corner cases and percolate through the mind.

    You know that such in-your-face, judgmental riddle-solving has ZERO bearing on the kind of work that you as a programmer from day-to-day.

  • (Score: 2) by requerdanos on Friday October 05 2018, @05:01PM (2 children)

    by requerdanos (5997) Subscriber Badge on Friday October 05 2018, @05:01PM (#744690) Journal

    I do know that this sort of spring-it-on-you puzzling has very little to do with job performance.

    At the same time, I note that had this been part of the interview process when I got my first freelance contract in 1983 (to port software from some CP/M based BASIC on a DEC Rainbow into Applesoft for the Apple II) I might not have got the job, not having the critical thinking and creative skills to envision the solution, whereas now, after decades of (hopefully) improvement, I would probably see the answer to something like that at once--so it might be some sort of indicator after all.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 05 2018, @05:06PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 05 2018, @05:06PM (#744693)

      That's why software sucks. You guys are tinkerers, not engineers.

      • (Score: 2) by requerdanos on Friday October 05 2018, @05:17PM

        by requerdanos (5997) Subscriber Badge on Friday October 05 2018, @05:17PM (#744702) Journal

        software sucks. You guys are tinkerers, not engineers.

        No argument there. I lay no claim to being an engineer. After initially declaring an Engineering major, I soon switched to Business and there I graduated.

        If you know of a way to enforce engineering first, code second, especially in the wild, where most free software communities do their bad-engineering-code-tinkering, you would be doing the world a great favor.