Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Officials Reject Idea of Blackwater Founder Privatizing the War in Afghanistan

posted by martyb on Saturday October 06 2018, @11:09PM   Printer-friendly
from the further-privatizing dept.

takyon writes:

Afghan officials reject push to privatize war

Afghan officials have rejected a proposal by Blackwater founder Erik Prince to have his private military contracting company take over the training and advising of the Afghan armed forces.

Prince lobbied several Afghan politicians on a recent trip to the country and has been discussing his proposal to privatize parts of the U.S. military mission in the country for over a year, according to Reuters.

But Afghan President Ashraf Ghani has repeatedly dismissed the idea. "Under no circumstances will the Afghan government and people allow the counterterrorism fight to become a private, for-profit business," Ghani's national security adviser said in a statement to Reuters Thursday.

U.S. Secretary of Defense James Mattis has also rejected the proposal, saying in August, "When Americans put their nation's credibility on the line, privatizing it is probably not a wise idea."

See also: The Last Americans Fighting in Afghanistan
17 years later, Americans tend to consider Afghanistan a failure

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Officials Reject Idea of Blackwater Founder Privatizing the War in Afghanistan | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 29 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 4, Informative) by c0lo on Sunday October 07 2018, @12:55AM

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Sunday October 07 2018, @12:55AM (#745289) Journal

    Not quite. The entry hole is the size of a pencil. The exit wound, on the other hand, is much bigger. This is kinda how bullets work. Ideally there won't be an exit wound, cuz that means wasted energy. You want the target to absorb as much energy as that bullet has, which means there is no exit wound.

    The theory goes like "Wound, but don't kill the enemy soldier; taking care of 1 wounded take other 3-4 away from the battle"

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Informative=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  
    Total Score:   4