Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Netherlands Ordered to Increase Greenhouse Emissions Cuts

posted by martyb on Tuesday October 09 2018, @08:07PM   Printer-friendly
from the Luctor-et-blubblubblub dept.

fritsd writes:

In a Dutch appeals court verdict, the government of the Netherlands has been ordered to uphold a lower court's ruling that the Netherlands is responsible for reducing its own greenhouse emissions more, so that the effort better reflects the seriousness of the consequences of global warming for the Low Countries' own citizens.

This is a worldwide first, that a government is ordered to take measures against AGW.

From the Guardian: Dutch appeals court upholds landmark climate change ruling

Other sources: de Volkskrant (unfortunately paywalled :-( )

NRC Handelsblad 2018-10-09 "Urgenda-uitspraak maakt burgers partij in klimaatbeleid" (in Dutch)

FAZ 2018-10-09 "Niederlande werden zu Klimaschutz gezwungen" (in German)

Le Monde: nothing yet

"Urgenda", the activists that started the court case: Urgenda Foundation (in English) N.B. website very slow at the moment.

CNN: nothing yet

Fox News: Fox Business 2018-10-09 "Dutch appeals court upholds landmark climate case ruling"

(I can already imagine the advert: "For sale: coal power plant "MPP3". slightly used. Location: Maasvlakte, probably a bit above sea level (ish). Conveniently next door to de Noordzee. Transport costs not included.")

(to eds: I couldn't decide if this topic fell under "survival", "politics", "law", "tech" or "energy", so I plonked it in "Techonomics". Please advise. FAZ put it under "economics" and NRC under "news")

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Netherlands Ordered to Increase Greenhouse Emissions Cuts | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 18 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 3, Informative) by Aegis on Tuesday October 09 2018, @11:28PM (3 children)

    by Aegis (6714) on Tuesday October 09 2018, @11:28PM (#746700)

    The government plans to deliver a report on what to do by next spring. So they will have at most 10 months

    This is an appeal, the original ruling was in 2015.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  
    Total Score:   3  

  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 09 2018, @11:42PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 09 2018, @11:42PM (#746707)

    Which means what? All I did is read TFA, in there they say according to the ruling they need to do this by 2020.

    • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 10 2018, @05:50AM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 10 2018, @05:50AM (#746835)

      Which means they were already supposed to be working on it for the past 3 years.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 10 2018, @12:02PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 10 2018, @12:02PM (#746912)

        Yes, I got that. What is the relevance of it?