Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Friday October 12 2018, @04:20AM   Printer-friendly
from the vax>x86 dept.

A small but increasing number of children in the United States are not getting some or all of their recommended vaccinations. The percentage of children under 2 years old who haven't received any vaccinations has quadrupled in the last 17 years, according to federal health data released Thursday.

Overall, immunization rates remain high and haven't changed much at the national level. But a pair of reports from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention about immunizations for preschoolers and kindergartners highlights a growing concern among health officials and clinicians about children who aren't getting the necessary protection against vaccine-preventable diseases, such as measles, whooping cough and other pediatric infectious diseases.

The vast majority of parents across the country vaccinate their children and follow recommended schedules for this basic preventive practice. But the recent upswing in vaccine skepticism and outright refusal to vaccinate has spawned communities of undervaccinated children who are more susceptible to disease and pose health risks to the broader public.

[...] The data underlying the latest reports do not explain the reason for the increase in unvaccinated children. In some cases, parents hesitate or refuse to immunize, officials and experts said. Insurance coverage and an urban-rural disparity are likely other reasons for the troubling rise.

Among children aged 19 months to 35 months in rural areas, about 2 percent received no vaccinations in 2017. That is double the number of unvaccinated children living in urban areas.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/percentage-of-young-us-children-who-dont-receive-any-vaccines-has-quadrupled-since-2001/2018/10/11/4a9cca98-cd0d-11e8-920f-dd52e1ae4570_story.html?utm_term=.3db2620fea5d


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 12 2018, @04:21PM (6 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 12 2018, @04:21PM (#747957)

    Oh no! Those public health epidemiologists are trying to manipulate people by showing them evidence that their unhealthy beliefs are based on "misconceptions".

    How dare they assume that they actually know more than the common person does when they have merely studied the subject for years.

    Nothing is truly knowable; therefore, objective reality does not exist and my truth could never be false.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Touché=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Touché' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 12 2018, @04:41PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 12 2018, @04:41PM (#747961)

    Oh no! Those public health epidemiologists are trying to manipulate people by showing them evidence that their unhealthy beliefs are based on "misconceptions".

    How dare they assume that they actually know more than the common person does when they have merely studied the subject for years.

    Nothing is truly knowable; therefore, objective reality does not exist and my truth could never be false.

    Its interesting how the same people who trust and perform NHST (where you test a strawman null hypothesis instead of your hypothesis, then draw conclusions about your hypothesis) also tend to come up with strawman arguments in general. Its like a personality type, or mental state. Maybe I should email someone who studies the minds of NHST users, eg Gerd Gigerenzer [mpib-berlin.mpg.de], about this phenomenon.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 12 2018, @05:13PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 12 2018, @05:13PM (#747969)

      It's interesting how some people employ motivated skepticism to deny any evidence that goes against their preconceptions.
      It sure seems convenient to always maintain your initial belief because you can find a reason why counter evidence isn't perfect and, therefore, inconsequential.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 12 2018, @05:39PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 12 2018, @05:39PM (#747976)

        Nope, I looked at the study and it was crappy in the same way as thousands (tens of thousands by now?) of other studies I have looked at and dismissed for the exact same reasons. Then on top of that they have this ridiculous conception of how their target audience thinks because they think in terms of populations instead of individual people. Those results are uninterpretable, one would hope they learned from that wasted opportunity and improve their methods but I doubt it from what I read in there.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 12 2018, @06:42PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 12 2018, @06:42PM (#748000)

    the cdc are just lying whores pushing whatever soft kill weapons the completely unaccountable fucks at big Pharma and tax payer funded black ops want to inject into the slave children. the slaves are noticing their kids are now completely disabled so the sum doubles down along with their army of sycophantic brainwashed/brain damaged mob of zombies. keep it up and see what happens.

  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 12 2018, @07:31PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 12 2018, @07:31PM (#748012)

    Oh no! Those public health epidemiologists are trying to manipulate people by showing them evidence that their unhealthy beliefs are based on "misconceptions".

    Indeed. It is rather astounding that the anti-vaxxers would trust the word of a former Playboy playmate touting a now discredited study over the considered opinion of the world's most renowned doctors and epedemiologists. *Shrug*

    • (Score: 2) by Reziac on Saturday October 13 2018, @03:34AM

      by Reziac (2489) on Saturday October 13 2018, @03:34AM (#748166) Homepage

      Some people are just too stupid to live. Maybe we should let natural selection do its job... behind a suitable quarantine wall, where they won't endanger the rest of us.

      --
      And there is no Alkibiades to come back and save us from ourselves.