Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by chromas on Sunday October 14 2018, @10:00AM   Printer-friendly
from the ♫♪I-want-my-FTC♪♫ dept.

FCC Tells Court it has no "Legal Authority" to Impose Net Neutrality Rules:

FCC defends repeal in court, claims broadband isn't "telecommunications."

The Federal Communications Commission opened its defense of its net neutrality repeal yesterday, telling a court that it has no authority to keep the net neutrality rules in place.

Chairman Ajit Pai's FCC argued that broadband is not a "telecommunications service" as defined in federal law, and therefore it must be classified as an information service instead. As an information service, broadband cannot be subject to common carrier regulations such as net neutrality rules, Pai's FCC said. The FCC is only allowed to impose common carrier regulations on telecommunications services.

"Given these classification decisions, the Commission determined that the Communications Act does not endow it with legal authority to retain the former conduct rules," the FCC said in a summary of its defense [pdf] filed yesterday in the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

The FCC is defending the net neutrality repeal against a lawsuit filed by more than 20 state attorneys general, consumer advocacy groups, and tech companies. The FCC's opponents in the case will file reply briefs next month, and oral arguments are scheduled for February.

Then why not let the states implement it?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 14 2018, @03:37PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 14 2018, @03:37PM (#748637)

    But, its 2018, time for a legal redefinition of what the term 'telecommunications' means.

    But then that means involving the congress critters, of which there are likely only one or two out of 535 total (house + senate) who even have an understanding of broadband beyond this: "it is this magical pipe that brings these sweet things named bits to my computer".

    The result being that whatever definition of "telecom" resulted from those incompetents working on it would likely either resemble a definition created by a committee of inebriated fools, or would so clearly be a carefully crated paragraph direct from Pai's masters that contains enough Swiss cheese holes that nothing, not even POTS copper, could be considered telecom. services anymore.

  • (Score: 2) by Pslytely Psycho on Sunday October 14 2018, @08:32PM

    by Pslytely Psycho (1218) on Sunday October 14 2018, @08:32PM (#748703)

    "But then that means involving the congress critters, of which there are likely only one or two out of 535 total (house + senate) who even have an understanding of broadband beyond this: "it is this magical pipe that brings these sweet things named bits to my computer". "

    That seems a tad optimistic...

    --
    Alex Jones lawyer inspires new TV series: CSI Moron Division.