Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Wednesday October 17 2018, @12:00AM   Printer-friendly
from the accidental-kidnapping-and-execution dept.

Saudis preparing to admit Jamal Khashoggi died during interrogation, sources say

The Saudis are preparing a report that will acknowledge that Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi's death was the result of an interrogation that went wrong, one that was intended to lead to his abduction from Turkey, according to two sources.

One source says the report will likely conclude that the operation was carried out without clearance and transparency and that those involved will be held responsible.

One of the sources acknowledged that the report is still being prepared and cautioned that things could change.

The Washington Post columnist was last seen in public when he entered the Saudi consulate in Istanbul in Turkey on October 2. Previously, Saudi authorities had maintained Khashoggi left the consulate the same afternoon of his visit, but provided no evidence to support the claim.

Saudi Arabia could hike oil prices over the Khashoggi case. Here's why it would backfire

Saudi Arabia's not-so-veiled threat issued in a government statement Sunday emphasized its "vital role in the global economy" and that any action taken upon it will be met with "greater action". But as oil ticks upward, a look at history and geopolitics suggests that while a Saudi-driven oil price spike would bring pain for much of the world, it would ultimately backfire on itself.

"If this is something the Saudis were allowed to do, they'd be really shooting themselves in the foot," Warren Patterson, commodities analyst at ING, told CNBC's Squawk Box Europe on Tuesday. "In the short to medium term we'll definitely see an incremental amount of demand destruction, but the bigger issue is in the longer term."

Any action in withholding oil from the market, he said, "would only quicken the pace of energy transition."

Previously: Turkey Says that a Missing Critic of the Saudi Government was Killed in Saudi Consulate in Istanbul


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Informative) by Runaway1956 on Wednesday October 17 2018, @01:29AM (1 child)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday October 17 2018, @01:29AM (#749748) Journal

    Drone strikes don't count? Why not? Those are pretty damned brazen.

    Since you seem to unaware of crimes committed by the US and/or US operatives, you might start with the wiki page on black ops. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_operation [wikipedia.org]

    Then you might recall the Blackwater mercenaries, who carried out a lot of US missions that were too "sensitive" to commit troops directly. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackwater:_The_Rise_of_the_World%27s_Most_Powerful_Mercenary_Army [wikipedia.org]

    Bear in mind that a successful mission never made the news. If clandestine operations are reported, then they have failed to some degree, or maybe even completely.

    I was having one of those brain farts, finally remembered the term I want: rendition. First three links after putting that word into a search:

    http://oilempire.us/rendition.html [oilempire.us]
    https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/05/08/a-brief-history-of-american-torture/ [counterpunch.org]
    https://www.hrw.org/news/2014/12/09/usa-and-torture-history-hypocrisy [hrw.org]

    Here, you may be tempted to complain that the US plays by certain rules, or something. That our targets are suspected of terrorism, or something. Or, that our targets are comatants, or something. Complain away.

    The fact remains that we commit acts similar to what Saudi Arabia is accused of in this instance.

    You may also complain that Saudi Arabia and/or some other country doesn't play this game by our rules, which would be hilarious. If a con man in the street, or a huckster at a bar, bets you that he can do $impossible feat, do you take his bet? Derp! Of course you don't! His game, his rules, he wins no matter what. Ditto in the global geopolitical scene. If we write the rules, and everyone agrees to play by our rules, we are certain to win.

    Hence, we see China playing our game, BY THEIR OWN RULES.

    Getting off track here. Do your own search, and you'll find plenty of renditions in our history.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Interesting=1, Informative=2, Total=3
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by MichaelDavidCrawford on Wednesday October 17 2018, @01:38AM

    by MichaelDavidCrawford (2339) Subscriber Badge <mdcrawford@gmail.com> on Wednesday October 17 2018, @01:38AM (#749761) Homepage Journal

    All too commonly our combatants are wedding guests

    --
    Yes I Have No Bananas. [gofundme.com]