Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Monday October 22 2018, @05:09AM   Printer-friendly
from the another-day-another-breach dept.

Hackers breach HealthCare.gov system, get data on 75,000

A government computer system that interacts with HealthCare.gov was hacked earlier this month, compromising the sensitive personal data of some 75,000 people, officials said Friday.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services made the announcement late in the afternoon ahead of a weekend, a time slot agencies often use to release unfavorable developments.

Officials said the hacked system was shut down and technicians are working to restore it before sign-up season starts Nov. 1 for health care coverage under the Affordable Care Act.

About 10 million people currently have private coverage under former President Barack Obama's health care law.

Consumers applying for subsidized coverage have to provide extensive personal information, including Social Security numbers, income, and citizenship or legal immigration status.

The system that was hacked is used by insurance agents and brokers to directly enroll customers. All other sign-up systems are working.

Also at Engadget and TechCrunch


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 22 2018, @02:51PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 22 2018, @02:51PM (#751984)

    When O-care came out, my BCBS PPO was forcibly canceled, then I got a letter saying "Look at your new plan, it is half the coverage at 150% the price! Yay!", then when I didn't pay it they sent me threatening letters about an account I never signed up for. (technically mail fraud) The DNC spewed great vacuous bluster about the numbers of people signing up. Rather than buying in I chose to take the risk. Then congress mandated with the blessing of SCOTUS, that the state could demand that private citizens MUST pay institututional monopolies in my state, without them being compelled to be transparent about product pricing.

    The thing is, after that I was still a Democrat. I figured it would settle eventually, and we'd finally be looking at either a transparent market or a socialized healthcare system. In either case I'd be chuffed. I figured either was better than the current level of corruption.

    Then the DNC defrauded their constituents during the HRC/Bernie primary. Then Trump killed the individual mandate, taking me from being a criminal for refusing to comply with constitutionally unlawful regulations, to being a citizen again overnight.

    At this point, it is Trump 1, DNC -2.

    The funny thing is, the DNC still hasn't apologized. After pig fucking the healthcare system, then making it brutally clear they didn't want progressive men in the party, they continue to have the brass to accuse people of every crime under the sun. And yeah they're right. But that doesn't make them any less of a of bunch of shit stirring frauds themselves. The DNC is as lacking in introspection as it was 2 years ago. Clearly the DNC's goal is to elect Trump, again. That is more plausible, than any alternative explaination I can think of.

    So no, I will not be voting for them because Trump is an asshole. Fucking the next guy isn't in an of itself, reason to support anybody or anything. I'll find somebody who knows what they're about, and offer them my vote. Because there is no distinction between the DNC/RNC. They are working together. There is no other explination that jives with the facts. And that is really the true clintonian legacy. They deregulated the media markets concentrating corporate control over interpersonal communications, then repealed Glass Steigal destabalizing the markets, then they utterly destroyed the reputation of the DNC. The Clintons have advanced more republican agendas than the republicans have.

    And the DNC still regards them as demigods. There is no fucking way this isn't contrived. But if you need to test that fact, go ahead. Vote for them again because "I don't like her, but she's going to win because she has money", as if the win came before the vote. I must have heard that dozens times, while I was being called a "Bernie Bro" and various other derogatory things. And make some more rediculous excuses and accusations when you loose again. Because that always endears people to loosers.

    If you aren't considering third parties, you aren't supporting a two party system.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 22 2018, @03:56PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 22 2018, @03:56PM (#752020)

    I feel you, AC. For whatever reason the DNC has decided to use all the most ineffective strategies it can imagine. It is only rational to conclude that the Democratic Party supports the exact same things that the Republican Party does. The only opposition they offer up is in the form of divisive identity politics and other bullshit meant to keep the working class polarized and distracted.

    In fact, get a load of this. Report Says Russia-gaters Should Go Quietly in the Night [consortiumnews.com]:

    “While [Mueller is] under no deadline to complete his work, several sources tracking the investigation say the special counsel and his team appear eager to wrap up,” Politico reports [politico.com].

    “The public, they say, shouldn’t expect a comprehensive and presidency-wrecking account of Kremlin meddling and alleged obstruction of justice by Trump?—not to mention an explanation of the myriad subplots that have bedeviled lawmakers, journalists and amateur Mueller sleuths,” the report also says, adding that details of the investigation may never even see the light of day. “It will be up to DOJ leaders to make the politically turbo-charged decision of whether to make Mueller’s report public,” Politico reported.

    So that’s it then. An obscene amount of noise and focus, a few indictments and process crime convictions which have nothing to do with Russian collusion, and this three-ring circus of propaganda and delusion is ready to call it a day.

    (Note: I moved the link in the article's introduction into the part I quoted.)

    Remember that thing about removing Trump from office if we all vote for the Democratic Party in a couple weeks? Even if they, somehow against all odds, win the Senate... fuhgeddaboudit.

  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 23 2018, @12:45AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 23 2018, @12:45AM (#752265)

    When O-care came out, my BCBS PPO was forcibly canceled, then I got a letter saying "Look at your new plan, it is half the coverage at 150% the price!

    Specifics? ACA added to the list of ailments that must be covered, not subtracted. Yes, requiring it to cover a list of things may make insurance more expensive, but I'm skeptical it made your PPO cover less. Your PPO may have voluntarily decided to cut some covered ailments, but that's not the ACA doing it directly. You can shop around for other PPOs if they give you a bad deal.

    If anyone has a better general HC plan, let's see it. All I see from GOP is either vague talking points, or less coverage when they offer something that's actually computable. There's no magic lunch. If you look around the world, the best systems in terms of both cost and service tend to resemble single payer.

    Some say, "let me pay for only what I want to cover", but that's not really insurance: it doesn't pool the costs and risks. It's pretend insurance.

    • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 23 2018, @03:44PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 23 2018, @03:44PM (#752500)

      "Your PPO may have voluntarily"

      No. They CANCELED my PPO. They didn't change the policy, they unilaterally canceled it. Then they sent me a letter telling me I had a whole new account with totally different coverage. I went from ~$200/m $2k deductable no copay, to my dick in my hand and a letter offering a new account at around $300/m with a %50 copay.

      BCBS canceled my policy. Period. End of of fucking story. Then they committed mail fraud by billing me for a different policy under a different contract I never solicited or signed up for. And if it happened to me, it happened to thousands of people, who were mostly private contractors or in the trades. But you know what? My neighbors kids are getting dental care from O-care and I'd have to pay for my own if I signed on.

      Yes I understand this contradicts what Obama said on TV hundreds of times. But it is in fact what I experienced.

      And the DNC takes victory laps, and drinks champagne over O-care, and hails the extraordinary glory of their achievement. Yet there is STILL no transparency in product pricing in the health care industry making it one of the most financially opaque, and non-competetive large industries in the country.

      And I am supposed to vote for the DNC because Trump is corrupt and shags tarts?

      You know what? I was a criminal last year for not having health insurance. This year I'm not. There is no affordable policy in O-care that doesn't make a critical care injury a bankrupting event for me. And I've been healthy all my life. But what you saw on TV somehow is supposed to be more real and important to me, than those two facts?

      That you don't understand how this could be, is not in question. The DNC doesn't understand it either. O-care fucked over a lot of Americans. If you don't know that, you are in a filter bubble.

      Further, don't lecture on the menutia of insurance or economics if you don't understand it. The issue here is not ideology, it is implementation. The current implementation is lacking in transparency, and violates half a dozen sections of the Constitution, regardless of what SCOTUS has to say about it. There are dozens of ways to move forward, but none offered by either the DNC or RNC solve these problems. I was your friend two years ago. If I'm your enemy now, perhaps you might consider what part you played in that?

      Oh right. You don't do that. You're a demopublican.