Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Tuesday October 23 2018, @04:20AM   Printer-friendly
from the funding-secured dept.

Mozilla is going to sell VPN subscriptions within Firefox

Beginning October 24th, the ad will show for select US-based Firefox users who are running the latest version — Firefox 62 — on desktop. If eligible and browsing on an unsecured network, you'll be shown an ad in the top right corner of your Firefox window that prompts you to click through to a sign up page.

Mozilla is offering ProtonVPN's services for $10 a month, which is actually $2 more than if you signed up for the same package directly through ProtonVPN. But, the majority of the revenue from ProtonVPN subscriptions that are processed through Mozilla will go directly to Mozilla. Both companies are banking that people will have good will about paying a little more in order to support their "shared goal of making the internet a safer place."

Also at ZDNet.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Troll) by Arik on Tuesday October 23 2018, @06:28AM (5 children)

    by Arik (4543) on Tuesday October 23 2018, @06:28AM (#752369) Journal

    All that happens with noscript is that a message appears over it in the add-ons manager saying that it may cause stability problems.

    Which is a lie along the lines of 'failing to eat your spam may cause erection disorders.'

    Well, no, there's absolutely no evidence for it, no reason for any reasonable human being to believe you, ahh but so clever we used 'may!' *rolls eyes*

    Noscript causes no stability problems. Scripts cause all kinds of problems, including stability problems. Noscript fixes those problems.

    Noscript would not be necessary, were browser sane.

    Noscript is necessary.

    Browser would be sane, if browser authors were sane?

    Not sure, but it seems likely.

    Ergo, browser authors likely insane.

    And this explains so much, so clearly.

    But the questions remain, can one write a browser without going insane?

    And is Sir Tim Berners-Lee a great human being? Or the viscous incarnation of the thing that should not let it be [youtube.com]?

    --
    If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   -1  
       Troll=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Troll' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 23 2018, @07:22AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 23 2018, @07:22AM (#752391)

    And yet, none of this is stopping you from using noscript in palemoon.

    PS - whether noscript causes stability problems or not is impossible to reliably ascertain without in-depth testing. It may look like it doesn't, and as someone who has used it since it's inception I'd also err on that side, but there's no telling what havoc it can wreak as a result of PEBKAC colliding with badly designed scripts. It doesn't help that PEBKAC prone users are quicker to blame the browser than the extension or the website or their own usage of the latter two (although, this too is unsubstantiated - nobody has ever statistically tested this, unless gut feelings by upset developers count as statistics).

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 23 2018, @09:55PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 23 2018, @09:55PM (#752597)

    Switch to Umatrix.
    Life on the net is so much happier afterwards.

  • (Score: 2) by Freeman on Thursday October 25 2018, @03:26PM (2 children)

    by Freeman (732) on Thursday October 25 2018, @03:26PM (#753683) Journal

    Likely not insane, but high probability of greed.

    --
    Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"
    • (Score: 2) by Arik on Thursday October 25 2018, @03:38PM (1 child)

      by Arik (4543) on Thursday October 25 2018, @03:38PM (#753686) Journal
      Where would you draw the line between sane and insane greed?
      --
      If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?
      • (Score: 2) by Freeman on Thursday October 25 2018, @04:41PM

        by Freeman (732) on Thursday October 25 2018, @04:41PM (#753722) Journal

        Mozilla offering a service deal, isn't insane greed. Though, it may be revolting and enough to push some people to other more invasive, less functional, and/or untested Web Browsers. I'm also uncertain of what insane greed would be as opposed to someone just being insane and greedy at the same time.

        --
        Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"