Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Monday October 29 2018, @03:51PM   Printer-friendly
from the you-mean-besides-trees? dept.

Silicon Valley's largest accelerator is looking for carbon-sucking technologies — including one that could become 'the largest infrastructure project ever'

Earlier this week, Y Combinator, which has backed companies like Airbnb and Reddit, put out a request for startups working on technology that can remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

"It's time to invest and avidly pursue a new wave of technological solutions to this problem — including those that are risky, unproven, even unlikely to work," Y Combinator's website says.

Y Combinator is looking for startups working on four approaches that they acknowledge "straddle the border between very difficult to science fiction" — genetically engineering phytoplankton to turn CO2 into a storage-ready form of carbon, speeding up a natural process in which rocks react with CO2, creating cell-free enzymes that can process carbon, and flooding Earth's deserts to create oases.

Sam Altman, the president of Y Combinator, acknowledged that these ideas are "moonshots," but said that he wants to take an expansive approach to the issue.

Related: Negative Emission Strategy: Active Carbon Capture
Storing Carbon Dioxide Underground by Turning It Into Rock
A Startup is Pitching a Mind-Uploading Service That is "100 Percent Fatal"
Carbon Capture From Air Closer to Commercial Viability
Y Combinator Spreads to China
Lab-Made Magnesite could be Used for CO2 Capture
NASA Announces CO2 Conversion Challenge, With Up to $750k Awards


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by acid andy on Monday October 29 2018, @06:34PM (2 children)

    by acid andy (1683) on Monday October 29 2018, @06:34PM (#755252) Homepage Journal

    If what you say accurately reflects the norm, then it's probably a rare case where deregulation actually makes a lot of sense. There should still be environmental protections if it's an existing natural habitat, but on brownfield any trees are better than no trees with the exception of some of the more invasive non-native species.

    --
    If a cat has kittens, does a rat have rittens, a bat bittens and a mat mittens?
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by Sulla on Monday October 29 2018, @07:03PM (1 child)

    by Sulla (5173) on Monday October 29 2018, @07:03PM (#755276) Journal

    I actually don't think this is a case where deregulation helps, and this is not the process for everyone who might want to install a tree, just if the muni tries to do it. Sorry for lack of clarity.

    --
    Ceterum censeo Sinae esse delendam
    • (Score: 2) by acid andy on Monday October 29 2018, @08:12PM

      by acid andy (1683) on Monday October 29 2018, @08:12PM (#755323) Homepage Journal

      Apology accepted :)

      --
      If a cat has kittens, does a rat have rittens, a bat bittens and a mat mittens?