SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
More Evidence Identifies China as The Source of Mysterious Ozone-Destroying Emissions
For years, a mystery puzzled environmental scientists. The world had banned the use of many ozone-depleting compounds in 2010. So why were global emission levels [DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0106-2] [DX] still so high?
The picture started to clear up in June. That's when The New York Times published an investigation into the issue. China, the paper claimed, was to blame for these mystery emissions. Now it turns out the paper was probably right to point a finger.
In a paper [open, DOI: 10.1029/2018GL079500] [DX] published recently in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, an international team of researchers confirms that eastern China is the source of at least half of the 40,000 tonnes of carbon tetrachloride emissions currently entering the atmosphere each year. They figured this out using a combination of ground-based and airborne atmospheric concentration data from near the Korean peninsula.
Previously: Someone, Somewhere, is Making a Banned Chemical that Destroys the Ozone Layer
Illegal Chinese Refrigerator Factories Are Selling Banned CFCs
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 30 2018, @02:59AM (5 children)
> You're complaining that someone in a different state farts and it smells in your house. No, we don't really have "1 atmosphere" when it comes to pollution. We have many localized bodies of air, where the heavy pollution particles are generated and settle in the immediate area. It's why you don't want a coal plant near your house, but the one in the neighboring state is fine.
Not so fast -- https://www.csmonitor.com/1984/0621/062135.html [csmonitor.com]
From 1984 (seriously, not a reference to Orwell's book):
I remember when this was a big deal, in NY state our crushed-limestone driveway used to bubble when it rained.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 30 2018, @03:59AM (4 children)
The Christian Science Monitor. Seriously - why are you on this site? This is literally not the forum for you. This is a tiny community. If you are thinking to agitate or piss off people, all you are going to do here is have a small handfull of people laugh at you. Very small. Would your idiot trolling not be more appropriate somewhere where you have an audience >20?
I didn't click the link or read your post.
(Score: 2, Informative) by khallow on Tuesday October 30 2018, @01:07PM
I don't know about the present, but the CSM has long had a reputation for accurate and remarkably unbiased journalism. It has nothing beyond the name to do with the Christian Science religion.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 30 2018, @02:04PM
Just went looking for an older reference on acid rain and found that one from The Christian Science Monitor. There are plenty more, but as noted, this paper was highly respected for straight reporting back in the '80s.
Anyway, the point was that coal burning plants in the midwest USA were causing acid rain in the North East and it was to the point that it was damaging forests and many other things. Pollution is not as localized as the earlier poster claimed.
Oh, and I'm not new here, I'm logged in with a user number in the 3 digits, but normally post as AC.
(Score: 2) by hendrikboom on Tuesday October 30 2018, @05:04PM (1 child)
The Christian Science Monitor is an excellent newspaper for objective news. The Christian Science stuff is restricted to one regular article which is clearly labeled as such.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 31 2018, @08:18AM
Yes, idiots who read the CSM think it's an excellent newspaper for objective news. The Christian religion is an excellent guideline for your saving your soul. "How to rape little boys" is an excellent newspaper. Forget the title - they only have one article on what lube to use on the pink asshole of the little one - the rest is objective science on how CFCs cause global warming.
Now the rest of us who read and study actual science - the science with "math and shit" - do not get our science from the CSM. This is why we know that most pollution does not cause global warming and comprehend the basic concept of a particle in the atmosphere blocking sunlight from reaching the earth causing a reduction in temperature. The most famous of such studies was as noted when all the planes were grounded on 9/11, and there was a clear finding that pollution from airplanes reduces global warming. Now back to raping little boys - do you have any sons and where do they practice baseball (asking for a friend)?