Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Thursday November 01 2018, @03:24PM   Printer-friendly
from the sounds-like-a-great-idea dept.

This story from 9to5Google submitted via IRC for chromas

Enable JS for maximum security:

October is Cybersecurity Awareness Month and Google is announcing a slew of new features related to the sign-in process and account usage. New Google Account security protections include requiring JavaScript to be enabled when logging in and removing harmful apps during Security Checkup with Play Protect.

On the Account login page, Google runs a risk assessment that only allows the "sign-in if nothing looks suspicious." This analysis to protect against phishing requires that JavaScript be enabled, with Google noting that only .1% of users have it disabled. If that is the case, you will be prompted to enable it before signing in.

Chances are, JavaScript is already enabled in your browser; it helps power lots of the websites people use everyday. But, because it may save bandwidth or help pages load more quickly, a tiny minority of our users (0.1%) choose to keep it off. This might make sense if you are reading static content, but we recommend that you keep Javascript on while signing into your Google Account so we can better protect you

Once users are signed in, the Security Checkup feature now takes into account nefarious applications installed on Android devices, with Google Play Protect leveraged. You might be prompted to uninstall any harmful apps found on your phone, while Google recently beginning to recommend that users removed unused, but logged in devices.

Also at VentureBeat, ZDNet


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 01 2018, @06:12PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 01 2018, @06:12PM (#756541)

    Can you read what he said? Can you understand it? Would other English speaker be able to do the same? Then he's not wrong.

    Incidentally, Than vs Then generally falls under this as well. Many* native English speakers pronounce both as /ðən/ regardless of stress. So, as far as they are concerned, the spelling distinction is no less obsolete than many of the Victorian spelling oddities that were removed during the 30s-60s from the text books.

    *most nowadays in both the UK and US

  • (Score: 4, Informative) by bob_super on Thursday November 01 2018, @07:03PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Thursday November 01 2018, @07:03PM (#756563)

    I'd rather eat pussy than/then shit.
    Spelling matters.